Under Mark Carney’s Liberal government, the CMHC has quietly redefined ‘housing affordability’ to no longer mean 30% of income, but “perhaps 40-45% … [and] over 50% of income by 2035”.

  • streetfestival@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Wow, this is big. I mean, I didn’t think things were going to get any more affordable, but this deepens my belief in that prediction quite a bit. “Over 50% by 2035” sounds like a fiefdom, because people got a lot more bills than rent/housing - or at least that’s my oldthink perspective lol. It’s also sobering that this report was published in June and failed, insofar as I know, to make any splash in any Canadian mainstream news. I’m grateful for the Fediverse

    • patatas@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Honestly I only went and looked for the report because of a post on Bluesky by Peter Julian.

      That said, this post seems to have already gotten more reach than a sitting former MP’s did on that platform, so you’re right about the fediverse!

      Regardless, I agree it should be much bigger news.

        • patatas@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Lotta great NDP MPs lost their ridings, really sucks. Matthew Green lost here in Hamilton Centre too, so disappointing

    • teppa@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      What you dont understand about the plan to financially repress the youth by ballooning home values via mass immigration is that Brookfield has a large residential real estate portfolio, which will fall in value if home prices fall.

      I hope this helps.