• GrymEdm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The USA under Trump tried to depose the Venezuelan leader only 5 years ago or so. Speaking of Trump, a large portion of the USA is currently striving to elect someone who tried to overthrow democracy in their own nation. Electoral scrutiny is all well and good, but is the USA really the right arbitrator given their domestic election problems and history of interfering in Central/South America? What do Venezuelans think about US involvement?

    • jaybone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Then Russia interferes with US election. It’s election interference all the way down.

      Except it stops at countries like Russia where the complete election is fake.

      • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Russia had no effect on US elections. Please update your understanding, it’s years old now. The Mueller report was clear on this point - Russia’s connections were far deeper and more effective (in both directions) with the Democrats than the Republicans

        • natecheese@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          The point you’re trying to make here isn’t very clear.

          Are you saying:

          1. That Russia didn’t try to interfere with the 2016 and 2020 US presidential elections?
          2. Or are you saying that Russia did try to interfere, but they were incompetent and couldn’t actually do it?
          3. Or are you saying the Muller report clearly stated that there is a deep connection between Democrats and Russia, and only a much weaker connection between Russia and Republicans?
          4. Something else entirely or some combination of all of these?
            • natecheese@kbin.melroy.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              You’re being unnecessarily hostile. There is a lot of ambiguity in the statement as I outlined my comment.

              If you can clarify the point they were trying to make that would be great, if not you’re proving no value to this conversation.

              • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                Read the fucking Muller report or a summary of its findings re Russia and you’ll have your answer

                • natecheese@kbin.melroy.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Also unnecessarily hostile.

                  I’ve read the Mueller report and nothing in there supports your claims, which makes your statement even more confusing.

                  From the Wikipedia article on the Mueller report:

                  The report concludes that the investigation “did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities”.[4][5][6] Investigators had an incomplete picture of what happened due in part to some communications that were encrypted, deleted, or not saved, as well as testimony that was false, incomplete, or declined.[7][8][9]

                  More importantly:

                  However, the report states that Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election was illegal and occurred “in sweeping and systematic fashion”[10][11][12] but was welcomed by the Trump campaign as it expected to benefit from such efforts.[13][14][15] It also identifies myriad links between Trump associates and Russian officials and spies,[16] about which several persons connected to the campaign made false statements and obstructed investigations.[4] Mueller later stated that his investigation’s conclusion on Russian interference “deserves the attention of every American”.[17]

      • Nudding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Remember when gore won the election and then Bush became president? Or when Hilary got more votes and then trump became president?

      • OtakuAltair@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Unlike our glorious US empire where the elections are definitely totally legit

        No liberal “democracies” are democratic in the first place on account of being capitalist dictatorships

        • Alsephina@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Imran Khan was coup’d in 2022 for his independent foreign policies and replaced with a pro-US puppet (who sent weapons to Ukraine and bombed Iran), despite Imran being highly popular in Pakistan.

          He won the this year’s election from jail despite the whole election being completely filled with vote-rigging. It’s not quite clear where things are gonna go from here.

          • TheFonz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            I asked for a source or evidence. You provided a statement made by Imran Khan himself. A statement by a politician claiming that the US backed a coup in Pakistan is not evidence.

              • TheFonz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Wow. So i read the full transcript. A few points.

                1. We don’t know where this document originated and the intercept has not authenticated it (they at least claim as much)

                2. Nothing Lu said is out of line. Which part do you take umbrage with? Khan is definitely putting his spin on this.

                • mlg@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  It’s pretty much been confirmed because Imran Khan released parts of the message that match the version the intercept received much later, of which I already pointed out he was charged with breaking the state secrets law.

                  Lu was very set on wanting Imran Khan gone via the NCV. This cable wasn’t meant to negotiate anything with Imran Khan or even tell him to rectify his stance on Ukraine. He said clearly that ties with Washington deteriorated and would only be restored if IK was removed.

                  More importantly, the cable was directed towards the Pakistan army who has the ultimate power in Pakistan (and incidentally has been bribed several times before). They did as they were asked and helped the NCV succeed by helping the opposition bribe and coerce party members to swap sides overnight. Then, they swiftly arrested IK, banned PTI as a political party, tortured and killed their party members, assassinated some journalists, shutdown the internet, banned Twitter, and called it a day.

                  It’s nothing new for the USA or even Pakistan, it’s just that this was probably the first grassroots populist party in Pakistan to ever get a chance at running the country and it lasted all but 5 seconds because that invovled the idea of foreign sovereignty which is something the USA doesn’t like.

                  They can and will use whatever means necessary to keep their leverage in the global geopolitical scene.

                  • TheFonz@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    I read the content of the transcript. A lot of leaps are being made from one diplomat’s statements. Lu simply said they don’t want to cooperate with a leader that is rubbing shoulders with Putin and it’s perfectly reasonable considering a) Pakistan is the recipient of US foreign aid b) Putin is doing his best to annex every territory around Russia that he can before anyone stops him. Whatever Pakistan did to oust him needs further proof that it is directly caused by US interference. I haven’t seen that yet.

            • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              Really, someone physically in the space with direct experience of the event in question is not evidence? It’s because he’s brown and worships a god from the wrong part of the world, isn’t it?

                  • TheFonz@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    We should not ask for evidence and accept any blog post as news. Our masters will be pleased. Anyone dare ask for evidence will invite only downvotes on lemmy.ml. Asking about such downvotes is “whining”. We shall not question our masters. Slurp slurp. Please, more off that delicious cum from lemmy.ml world news.