• MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    11 days ago

    Yes, but also these are pretrial detainees, as in not yet convicted of any crime. Article 1 of the 13th amendment says “Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.” (emphasis my own)

    • roofuskit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      11 days ago

      Yes, this is unconstitutional,and the constitutional kind is immoral.

      I brought up convict leasing because charges were often made up or people were convicted of violations like not having a job. Essentially if you were black in the south you could be arrested and re-enslaved at any time. Not that far off from what we’re witnessing here. Trials were a formality and the laws were unjust to begin with.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Yep, they should have standing to sue for constitutional violations. It’s slavery even by the standards laid out by the constitution.

      Of course, that’s assuming a judiciary that actually cares about the constitution.