• mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    My dude, it sounds like you need to go out into the environment a bit more.

    oh you have a spare ecosystem in the closet for when this one is entirely fucked huh? https://www.npr.org/2024/09/11/nx-s1-5088134/elon-musk-ai-xai-supercomputer-memphis-pollution

    stop acting like it’s a rumor. the problem is real, it’s already here, they’re already crashing to build the data centers - so what, we can get taylor swift grok porn? nothing in that graph supports your premise either.

    That’s stanford graph is based on queries from 2022 and 2023 - it’s 2025 here in reality. Wake up. Times change.

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      That’s stanford graph is based on queries from 2022 and 2023 - it’s 2025 here in reality. Wake up. Times change

      Objective polling shows attitudes about AI were improving. Do you have any actual evidence to support your implication that this is no longer the case?

      Being self-righteous, rude and abrasive doesn’t mean you’re correct.

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        You disregard everyone else’s evidence but expect us to embrace your two year old data.

        you disregard what mental health experts are saying this is doing to actual people.

        You callously disregard the wellbeing of others for the benefit of aibros. Just because you’re ignoring the evidence doesn’t mean you’re correct numpty. Being willfully ignorant of the harms caused to the environment from this just tells me you’re profiting off of it, or a fanboy.