• CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    Still not dependable for Canadian winters, of course.

    In a large, fixed installation, maintaining a constant temperature should be no problem. They might actually have to cool it.

    Molten metal batteries are also a technology in consideration for that reason.

    • blindsight@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Even if the score is kept off, there’s the angle of the Sun and cloud cover. There’s just less sunlight to be had, even if the panels are kept clear of snow.

      Hell, Vancouver Island gets practically no snow at all in many areas, and solar does much worse in its cloudy/rainy season (winter).

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Yes, per area solar potential isn’t always high, so you do need more paneled land for the same thing. It still comes out cheaper at this point IIRC. On the prairies it’s actually comparatively great, solar-loving Germany is more like BC.

        In the arctic you’d have to store it for a full season, so they’re probably going to stick with other things in the near future, but that’s a small share of the population and demand.