• ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Everyone else learns it for these exams and nothing else

    A big part of learning is to learn how to learn. Without learning just for exams it’s hard to learn useful things later in life.

    • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I’m not sure if I am misinterpreting or misunderstanding your answer, but this is my response to everything.

      There’s a difference between learning for tests and learning critical literacy and inquiry-based learning. Unfortunately, schools are forced to teach to the test and many students don’t connect with it and/or they are multilingual or English language learners and are struggling because the tests go over things that are exclusive to American culture or students, in general, aren’t provided support.

      Yes, even math suffers. Word problems are a problem. Schools have to pull in social studies to other disciplines and science is often neglected for reading and math. There are a ton of behavior issues as well that teachers deal with that take away from time.

      There’s just SO much wrong with education. I’m in the middle of a master’s program for elementary education and I’m substitute teaching as well (career switch late in life). I’m learning a lot about this stuff when I didn’t really pay attention before.

      • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yes, all those issues are real. I was only talking about “learning for the sake of learning” criticism. I was force to memorize stupid poems in school that I soon forgot but even this lets you practice memory. Big part of education is just showing you how to decide which information is relevant, where to find it and how to memorize stuff. It doesn’t work when everything else is broken but just forcing people to memorize things is not an issue in itself.