• zergtoshi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m not the state so I’m not bound to free speech amendments.
      I see hate speech and I want it silenced - simple as that.

      People who abuse the idea of free speech to advocate for robbing others of their basic human rights play a stupid game and may win stupid prizes; even if those prizes aren’t dealt out by the state.

      • dirigibles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m not sure what you mean by ‘not being bound to free speech’. It’s the law of the land and kind of an important one.

        I’m curious, in your world view, who decides what is hate speech and what would you do if you disagreed with them?

        • Tiger666@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          You don’t understand what freedom of speech is. You have zero understanding of how anything works apparently. Typical liberal.

          • dirigibles@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I wouldn’t classify myself as a liberal, nor do I know what I said to lead you down that path. Either way, I’m here to exchange ideas. What am I misunderstanding about free speech?

        • zergtoshi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          The first amendment is prohibiting the government from restricting free speech.
          I, as an individual, can want to restrict speech of racist assholes as much as I feel the need to.
          I am who decides what is hate speech as much as hate preachers decide spewing their bullshit is ok.
          Why should I play by different rules?