Ok, so your initial claim was ‘Stochastic terrorism’. Essentially saying that he was using coded language to hide his calls to violence. Now you’re saying his words and actions were direct call to violence? Which case are you trying to make here? If he made direct calls for violence, he should have been arrested and charged with inciting violence. The laws are quite clear on this one.
Ok, so your initial claim was ‘Stochastic terrorism’. Essentially saying that he was using coded language to hide his calls to violence. Now you’re saying his words and actions were direct call to violence? Which case are you trying to make here? If he made direct calls for violence, he should have been arrested and charged with inciting violence. The laws are quite clear on this one.