lemmy.dudeami.win
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
mystic-macaroni@lemmy.ml to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 2 years ago

Boxers or Briefs?

message-square
message-square
38
fedilink
1
message-square

Boxers or Briefs?

mystic-macaroni@lemmy.ml to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 2 years ago
message-square
38
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Briefs

  • pixelscript@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Briefs. Actual support. The singular function underwear has.

    Boxers are just commando with extra steps. Utterly pointless.

    I consider all enlightened boxer brief centrists to be strictly in the briefs camp as boxer briefs are just briefs with leg extensions.

  • RobotServo81 he/him@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Briefs absolutely, hate boxers because of rolling and bunching.

  • Zahille7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Briefs all the way. I have to have separation between my balls and thighs, it’s way too annoying and uncomfortable for me to have them stick to my leg.

    Also I need to lose some weight, cause my thighs rub together when I walk, and briefs help make that more comfortable.

  • themadcodger@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Briefs. The problems guys complain about re: fit are usually because they’re cheap and/or don’t fit well. Find the right pair of briefs, and it’s like wearing nothing at all. And nothing bunching up your legs either.

  • MyDogLovesMe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Commando 100%

  • Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    deleted by creator

  • featured [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Boxer briefs. Best of both worlds

  • Facky [he/him,comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Boxer briefs

    I like briefs but find regular briefs too short (ironically)

  • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Boxerbriefs. Boxers just bunch up.

  • tobogganablaze@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Boxerbriefs.

    • shapesandstuff@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      the ideal underwear. None of the wedge and none of the flop.

      • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        The worst of both kinds. All the chafing of briefs but your balls still stick to your thigh when you get sweaty.

        • edric@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          deleted by creator

        • indepndnt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          I got a bunch of different kinds of boxer briefs a few years ago, and I learned from that experience that there is a WIDE variety of quality and fit in this category. They really shouldn’t chafe or let your balls stick to your thigh, if they do I’d highly recommend trying a different brand or fit or whatever.

    • Wes_Dev@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      These. Get some have that special dividers or pouches for extra comfort. So cozy.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      This is the way.

    • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Boxerbrief gang.

  • KlavKalashj@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Briefs, absolutely. The boxer trend is ridiculous. It’s getting hard finding briefs here at all, in Sweden. Imo, it all stems from middle school insecurity. We were all told briefs were gay and so now everyone is using boxers.

    • shapesandstuff@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      i agree with the cause for boxer popularity, but boxer briefs are superior to both imo.

      • KlavKalashj@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Oh wait, I might be behind on my terminology. What is the difference between boxers and boxer briefs? I think of boxers as the ones with legs, but they are tight. I just realized, according to american movies, that the shorts-style boxers might be popular? Boxers that are not tight fit. Am I correct?

    • portifornia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Oh that’s interesting! Locally in the US I’m always noticing the opposite: it’s all briefs or boxer-briefs, rarely boxers.

  • ReallyZen@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    jockstraps

    unparallel support, minimal heat buildup, max freedom

    • HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Finally someone gets it

  • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Panties

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m WFH - fuck 'em both.

    • treadful@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Skidmarks on furniture as far as the eye can see

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Brah.

        Wipe your ass better and, if you’ve still got issues, get a cover.

      • Zahille7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Username checks out

Asklemmy@lemmy.ml

asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !asklemmy@lemmy.ml

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it’s welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

  • !lemmy_support@lemmy.ml
  • !fediverse@lemmy.ml
  • !selfhosted@lemmy.world

Looking for a community?

  • Lemmyverse: community search
  • sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
  • !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 835 users / day
  • 2.33K users / week
  • 4.8K users / month
  • 16.3K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 50.5K subscribers
  • 5.25K Posts
  • 197K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Evan@lemmy.ml
  • mekhos@lemmy.ml
  • OrangeSlice@lemmy.ml
  • tmpod@lemmy.pt
  • BE: 0.19.8
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org