I recently saw Star Trek Picard, the first season was okey, season 2 was awful, the season 3 was nice.

Acording some critics last Discovery season is bad, so now I’m afraid of looking a series who has a bad ending, it worth to watch or is as painful as Picard Season 2? Or I should watch Strange New Worlds and Enterprise instead?

  • bgainor@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Star Trek Discovery is not “that bad”. Like Picard and some of the seasons of Enterprise, each season is a self-contained story arc, which I get is not for everyone. It also has a black female main character, which apparently is also not for everyone. IMO, the fifth season was not quite as good as the first four (I actually like the fourth the best), but there was still a lot to like. I do think they did better after they moved to the 31st century so they weren’t as constrained by canon gymnastics. It also (for a single season) gives us our only non-human main ship captain to-date, which I think is a good thing in a series centered on the idea of friendship with other worlds. There are definitely things I would change about the show if I could, but on the whole I think it’s a great addition to Trek.

    (Also, Michelle Yeoh, Mary Wiseman, and Tig Notaro each steal every single scene any of them is in. Worth watching for those three alone.)

  • CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    It’s not awful. In fact it has a lot of great high points. On balance, I would say that if you compared it objectively to the first 65 episodes of TNG, it would compare rather favorably.

  • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I very much enjoyed the start but steadily lost interest.

    There’s some good stuff in Discovery all the way through, don’t get me wrong. But they kind of flipped the script in a way I did not appreciate.

    Most of classic Trek showed us a future with a largely functional society, mostly full of good people who were ready and willing to deal with occasional corruption.

    Lots of newer Trek, and especially Discovery, showed us a future where society is largely dysfunctional and corruption is the norm. Almost everyone in the series who isn’t a main character (plus a couple who are) is a piece of shit. Even the “good guys” frequently encourage or at least tolerate clearly evil behavior as long as it serves their ends. But it’s okay because…friendship I guess?!?

    Their heart is in the right place but the writing is generally bad. I think this generation of writers is incapable of imagining a better world, which, sure, is understandable, given how thoroughly corrupt our current society is. But it’s deeply depressing. It lacks soul.

    SNW is better in this regard. But you’ll probably want to watch season 1 of Discovery first since there’s some crossover.

  • III@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    It’s fine.

    And those that disagree should be forced to watch Star Trek: Section 31 until they can have a reasonable conversation like an adult.

  • firewyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Discovery was so bad I had to stop after season 2 and have written off everything that they’ve set in the 31st century

  • moopet@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    It’s not very good, but it does have some really good moments, and some really good ideas mixed in with the less-good stuff. It’s worth watching. Just put your fingers in your ears and la-la-la through all the Klingon retconning and inappropriate pathos. There are moments where the emotional storyline are good, but they cry wolf too often.

  • CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    You need to get passed the first story arc, then it gets really good. It doesn’t really feel Star Trek™ at first, but that changes and it’s worth the journey.

  • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    It’s fine. It’s probably the weakest of the modern Trek shows, but only because SNW and LDS are so good.

  • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    No. Far from it. The First half of the first season sucks, second half gets better, Second Season is really watchable, third season is where it grows it’s beard.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    The main problem with discovery is they set it basically in the tos timeline which created all these weird plot things that had to be resolved with weirder plot things. I firmly believe if they had set it a decent amount post voyager that it would have made it much better. I don’t want to spoil but I felt season 2 fit better but having such weird start really messed it up for me.

  • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’ve been doing a complete rewatch of Deep Space 9, and it really underscored why I didn’t enjoy Discovery and Picard. My favourite parts of DS9 are the character driven moments, whether they’re big and dramatic, or lightweight and silly. I like that the show has enough space for that. The show has more Plot than previous Star Trek, but that Plot still serves the characters. Discovery is not nearly as bad as Picard on this front, but I still found myself wishing for more opportunity to get to know the characters.

  • Corgana@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    It’s also important to separate what you’re seeing online from the leftovers of a manufactured “opposition campaign” orchestrated by a handful of reactionary influencers.

    Personally speaking I did not like the early two seasons, but I thought three is ok, and seasons four and five I consider to be some of Trek’s best!

  • ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Naw it’s a journey. I accepted discovery like I did voyager. Once I saw what it was in it own, much better. Second watch got better, just like voyager.

  • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    There is an entire season about warp drive not working anywhere in the universe. It turns out that it stopped working because an alien got really sad. Not because he did anything because he was sad, just because he got sad. Ohh, and somehow the Vulcans, with all their logic, never thought of tracking down the cause by triangulation.

    That was the end of the series for me.

    • surfrock66@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      This, and he wanted connection from someone of his species, and the first officer of the one ship that can overcome the plot debuff happens to be that species, a species we barely see outside this plot…it’s writing so bad you can’t see the show through it. Emotional stories are appropriate, it’s why Troi was a bridge officer. But this show was constantly setting up unsolvable problems that could only be fixed by this one crew, which breaks immersion. Good trek doesn’t have 50 Galaxy or universe ending threats only fixable by plot-armored main characters, it has ship, person, and planet level threats giving you the space to appreciate the human story. Even DS9 kept the stories on missions while the thread of the war was just a hum with reasonable stakes.

    • StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      I really find this narrative offensive.

      First there’s the mischaracterization of a very young and completely dependent who child completely abandoned with the death of the last adult who cared or supported him.

      But more than that, Star Trek is littered with a trope about children with incredible powers to interact with the universe who nearly destroy the galaxy or civilizations or large swaths of them.

      It started with Charlie X, and was taken up by every other series, sometimes more than once.

      On all those other occasions, our hero ship and crew miraculously saved the day and prevented disaster by psychic or superpowered child who was incapable of adult decision-making.

      Discovery called the bluff.

      Discovery reversed the trope, had the child’s powers actually destroy civilization.

      Instead of the hero crew stopping the disaster in the nick of time (again), Discovery finds the child and solves the problem.

      And long time fans are offended by THAT?!!

      • Corgana@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Honestly, when I hear that interpretation it makes me feel like the person didn’t actually watch the season, they just watched the outrage peddling influencers online.

        Semi-related but I lost count of the number of times someone on Reddit described Adira’s coming out (a ten second moment in a larger unrelated scene) as a “huge story arc” or being comprised of “multiple episodes” being “shoved in the audiences faces”. I felt like I was taking crazy pills until I learned that’s exactly how the outrage-tubers were presenting it. If you’d never watched the season you’d have no idea it was such an inconsequential moment.

        • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Honestly, when I hear that interpretation it makes me feel like the person didn’t actually watch the season, they just watched the outrage peddling influencers online.

          Sorry to say, I watched every single episode, up until the end of that season, myself. I’ll admit to being extra harsh in judging this season since I was already pretty fed up with the writing by that point. I had very little patience left.

          • Corgana@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            I’m sorry, but if you truly watched the entire season, you’d know that your description of the events is incongruous with the events as presented on screen.