Gorilladrums@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 2 天前What's a popular opinion on Lemmy that's unpopular in the real world?message-squaremessage-square131fedilinkarrow-up194arrow-down12
arrow-up192arrow-down1message-squareWhat's a popular opinion on Lemmy that's unpopular in the real world?Gorilladrums@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 2 天前message-square131fedilink
minus-squareKonstant@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up56·2 天前The other day on Reddit someone was saying they just fact checked something with ChatGPT.
minus-squareSpicyLengthiness@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down21·2 天前You can ask ChatGPT to provide sources you know.
minus-squareJessica@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up7·12 小时前The sources are bullshit https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_zfN9wnPvU0
minus-squareSpicyLengthiness@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-21 小时前Yea it has made shit up sometimes. But you can use your brain and check the sources … ? ChatGPT is just a more precise Google. You still have to check it yourself and use your head.
minus-squareJessica@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·58 分钟前So you didn’t watch the video then, got it. I guess you can ask ChatGPT to summarize the transcript for you 🙄
minus-squarejet@hackertalks.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down3·2 天前I’ve found it very useful as a tool to gather references from talks that don’t cite claims… It’s like a super search for context. I would never use a LLM to provide logic or reason, and sadly I think many people do.
The other day on Reddit someone was saying they just fact checked something with ChatGPT.
You can ask ChatGPT to provide sources you know.
Yeah. If ur dummy.
The sources are bullshit https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_zfN9wnPvU0
Yea it has made shit up sometimes. But you can use your brain and check the sources … ? ChatGPT is just a more precise Google. You still have to check it yourself and use your head.
So you didn’t watch the video then, got it. I guess you can ask ChatGPT to summarize the transcript for you 🙄
I’ve found it very useful as a tool to gather references from talks that don’t cite claims…
It’s like a super search for context. I would never use a LLM to provide logic or reason, and sadly I think many people do.