• Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Most wars in recent history haven’t ended in military defeat, they’ve ended when the attacker has decided the cost of the war is too much to bear, and has gone home.

    Both wars in Afghanistan and the Vietnam war are classic examples of this.

    And Ukraine is slowly bleeding Russia dry.

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Tanks are used as glorified personnel carriers since they get blown up by drones upon reaching the front line.

          What really matters is the last mile delivery and Russians have used trucks, cars, motorcycles, etc. whatever they had to deliver ammo

          • Perspectivist@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            My understanding is that they’re refined in different parts of the refinery. The drones Ukraine uses don’t carry large payloads; they rely on igniting whatever they hit. Diesel and crude are far less volatile than gasoline, so you’re more likely to cause a big fire by hitting the gasoline-processing part of the refinery. If you throw a match into a puddle of diesel or crude, nothing happens. Refining gasoline is also more complex and sensitive process and thus easier to disrupt. Russia mostly refines gasoline for domestic needs, whereas diesel is kept in much larger storage - so striking gasoline refining capacity has a quicker impact on supply lines and is felt by the common people.

    • meco03211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I’ve kinda wondered what even is the end goal for Russia. What do they consider their win condition? Let’s say Ukraine surrenders and submits to Russian control. That’s not the people. That’s just the government. I can see all sorts of guerilla warfare by the people happening then. And from stateless entities, it’ll be even harder to tamp down.

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 hours ago

        They did it in Chechnya before, just get a “governor” that continues to crush dissent

      • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Russia has a lot of experience in crushing dissent, I’m sure they’ve got a plan there.

        They originally wanted to fully conquer Ukraine, I think now they’d settle for the freezing of the front lines.

    • ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      10 hours ago

      At what point does Russia cease being the attacker in Crimea? They’ve had it under their control for 11 years now. It’s on Ukraine to launch an offensive to take it back.

      The more time goes on, the more Crimea becomes embedded into the Russian state. According to what I could find, about 76% of Crimeans are ethnic Russians and that has risen since 2014. At this point there’s no evidence that Crimeans would even accept the return of Ukrainian sovereignty.

      • arrow74@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I’m going to shit in your bathroom, claim it for myself, and keep you out until it’s my bathroom

      • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Yeah, because most of the original residents have left, and Russia has brought in a bunch of their own people.

        Do you think the ones who identify as Ukrainian would stick around?

            • ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Yes, but that would require Ukrainian forces to actually recapture Crimea militarily. The idea that the Russians will just run away eventually after being “bled out” is a ridiculous one. They’re going nowhere any time soon unless they are dislodged by force.

              • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                4 hours ago

                Goobers like you were once saying Ukraine resisting was futile, and Kyiv would fall in three days.

                Ukraine has consistently defied the naysayers, and kept a numerically superior force at bay. We’re now seeing them reach far behind enemy lines and wreck Russian infrastructure, and the cracks are slowly starting to show.

                I absolutely believe they can win this.

                • ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  I never said anything of the sort but sure. Goobers like you have been saying the cracks are showing for the past 3 years, so I’m just waiting to see this big collapse that is supposed to happen.

                  Ukraine has had its own infrastructure wrecked over the course of the war, so that doesn’t just apply to Russia. Everything is finite and it’s not like Ukraine is the only side being supplied by it’s allies.

                  A lot of people do believe Ukraine can win, but it’s about time the west got serious and gave Ukraine the tools they need to take decisive action soon. In the years since the 2014 crisis, we’ve seen the emergence of the Donetsk and Luhansk republics in Donbas backed by Russia. The more Russians that move there, the more there will be resistance to any idea of Kyiv governance in the future. You can’t control a territory without the consent of the people who live there.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    14 hours ago

    It’s Russia’s fault. If they didn’t want Ukrainians to blow them up, they could, you know, not have oil tanks.

    Or get the fuck out of Ukraine.