Practically everyone’s job is going to be automated away before long, the important thing is that production is socialised before practically 1 guy owns everything and has to pay no one.
At that point things end up pretty concrete.
These opinion pieces that pop up saying “ha-HA! Behold the petard they’re hoisting themselves with!” Kinda miss the importance of preparation.
They falsely expect an easing to an exponential curve.
The cat leapt out of the bag decades ago, we all need to make sure we’ve got something left at the end of it all
So it can just talk about things in a limited scope believably. I call it the “sounds about right machine” for a reason. It says things that sound about right and not much else.
Hard to tell what the actual value is here since “Online contractors” is a bit vague. AI coding is error prone and pretty limited. It’s basically a requirement to have someone to babysit it and studies done on this exact arrangement have shows that practically speaking far more time is wasted implementing AI in this arrangement than just having people do it.
The customer responses thing is fairly simple but is one of those cases where it works until it doesn’t. Small hallucinations by AI can mean serious liability for companies. At a bare minimum customers know they’re being replied to by a text generator and that results in feelings that you don’t value their patronage that much. Nobody liked getting pre-written responses written by humans. Having a bot generate a response without any input from an employee of your company is practically an insult.
When I say “AI can’t replace anyone’s job” I don’t mean that you physically can’t fire somebody and then turn on an AI, but that it is not and likely won’t ever be a worthwhile replacement. In your case you’ve “replaced people with AI” in the same sense as you can “replace” someone by firing them and not hiring a replacement at all. You save a few bucks, customer experience gets worse, there are more efficient ways to do that without investing in AI.
I’ve worked with a lot of companies that have tried to implement AI and I haven’t yet come across a success story. What little wins companies do get will disappear when the sweetheart pricing inevitably ends and the companies who are now relying on their AI have to shell out big time.
It doesn’t have to be AI. automation has already made a lost of jobs trivial or irrelevant, which is why we are so productive as a species and yet still do 40hr weeks.
Try searching for the theory of “bullshit jobs”. It’s all just patchwork to keep global capitalism based economy going in circles.
This is kinda cope
Practically everyone’s job is going to be automated away before long, the important thing is that production is socialised before practically 1 guy owns everything and has to pay no one.
At that point things end up pretty concrete.
These opinion pieces that pop up saying “ha-HA! Behold the petard they’re hoisting themselves with!” Kinda miss the importance of preparation.
They falsely expect an easing to an exponential curve.
The cat leapt out of the bag decades ago, we all need to make sure we’ve got something left at the end of it all
We haven’t yet made an AI that can replace anyone’s job, so it might be better to hold off on resigning ourselves to that fate.
I replaced all of my online contractors with AI. Our business will only hire local people from now on.
It is well worth the money, and we just had it write a few programs that do what those contractors did.
It sums up our email inbox for us.
It writes near perfect customer responses (trained on our business data).
I’m not sure what to tell you but some of you are going to be blindsided.
It’s just a small business, too. Now that we don’t need to pay those contractors (who did a worse job than what we get now) we are scaling up.
Believe me or don’t but i can’t be the only one doing this.
So it can just talk about things in a limited scope believably. I call it the “sounds about right machine” for a reason. It says things that sound about right and not much else.
Hard to tell what the actual value is here since “Online contractors” is a bit vague. AI coding is error prone and pretty limited. It’s basically a requirement to have someone to babysit it and studies done on this exact arrangement have shows that practically speaking far more time is wasted implementing AI in this arrangement than just having people do it.
The customer responses thing is fairly simple but is one of those cases where it works until it doesn’t. Small hallucinations by AI can mean serious liability for companies. At a bare minimum customers know they’re being replied to by a text generator and that results in feelings that you don’t value their patronage that much. Nobody liked getting pre-written responses written by humans. Having a bot generate a response without any input from an employee of your company is practically an insult.
When I say “AI can’t replace anyone’s job” I don’t mean that you physically can’t fire somebody and then turn on an AI, but that it is not and likely won’t ever be a worthwhile replacement. In your case you’ve “replaced people with AI” in the same sense as you can “replace” someone by firing them and not hiring a replacement at all. You save a few bucks, customer experience gets worse, there are more efficient ways to do that without investing in AI.
I’ve worked with a lot of companies that have tried to implement AI and I haven’t yet come across a success story. What little wins companies do get will disappear when the sweetheart pricing inevitably ends and the companies who are now relying on their AI have to shell out big time.
It doesn’t have to be AI. automation has already made a lost of jobs trivial or irrelevant, which is why we are so productive as a species and yet still do 40hr weeks.
Try searching for the theory of “bullshit jobs”. It’s all just patchwork to keep global capitalism based economy going in circles.