This should be helpful for people that learned Photoshop in the past (for work or in school). From what I understand, a lot of the friction with GIMP is the workflow differences, and potentially unintuitive UI/UX choices.

tldr: recovering Adobe Photoshop user shows you features in the very free and very open source gnu image manipulation program :D

my relevant GIMP config files: https://github.com/BreadOnPenguins/dots/tree/master/.config/GIMP/3.0

GIMP documentation: https://www.gimp.org/docs/

  • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    GIMP apologists are what Adobe users think FOSS apologists are like. The principled refusal to even consider fundamental UX principles is astounding.

    • FishFace@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah you might be right.

      I should clarify I use GIMP. A lot! But this is one way it sucks. By this point I don’t know what other similar programs even have over it - it finally got adjustment layers after some decades. So if I can recognise this shortcoming anyone should be able to ;)

      The other major thing was switching to single window mode. Floating windows for everything was absolutely batshit.

          • LeFantome@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Most Wayland compositors don not have the concept of multiple windows being one application. And you cannot always control how and where they appear.

            This is not a Wayland complaint. Just pointing out that old GIMP was just not very compatible with the core Design of Wayland.

            Depending on what compositor you use, a lot of this has really improved.