• dan1101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      14時間前

      Somebody needs to be responsible, otherwise ban self driving until someone figures it out. Impound the vehicle if need be.

      • Bubippbasbir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13時間前

        What? You can’t just demand accountability from AI bros, that would destroy their whole business model.

    • tlmcleod@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      17時間前

      The second one of these cars cause a fatal collision due to wanton disregard of the law on part of the CEO, he should be held criminally liable.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      17時間前

      They shouldn’t even be able to market it as self driving if they don’t insure the self driving mode itself.

    • drspawndisaster@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      24時間前

      That would be funny but better yet, the entire line of cars gets the feature deleted from them and customers are reimbursed the entire value of the car plus interest in exchange for having risked their lives testing an unstable and dangerous vehicle.

    • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12時間前

      CEOs like you’re talking about, they dont drive.

      the only time they’ll step behind the wheel of a car is for a pleasure cruise in some multi million dollar supercar on a track, or a closed / private road.

      • dev_null@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10時間前

        So what? Them driving is not relevant to this at all. The idea is that the cars they sell become illegal.