• buttnugget@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I don’t know, I’ve never particularly liked analogue clocks. I don’t think I ever thought of them as difficult to read, but it’s far superior to look at an exact number like digital usually features.

    • smiletolerantly@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Disagree - it rarely matters to me if it’s 13:24:56 or 13:25:05, but I do find the instant and intuitive gauging of time deltas super useful (as in, how long it’s going to be to the full hour / to quarter past / … ). Not saying you can’t get that info from a digital clock as well, of course you can; but the physicality of analog clocks lends a good bit of intuition to this, I feel.

      • Redex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I get that, but I personally find that I often do care about the exact time, down to the minutes, and that’s harder to track with an analogue clock. I don’t have particular problems in reading them, I just often prefer digital clocks.

        But I will agree that I feel analogue clocks give a better vibe of the time, since its basically a pie chart of how far you are in the day.