I would say so, yes. I’m not sure a judge would say this makes sense (judges could even dismiss this based on the fact there doesn’t appear to be an injured party or they could even force the USDA to pay the difference to grocers).
Realistically grocery stores were expecting to sell a certain amount of goods to SNAP recipients and if they don’t then that food just rots. Might as well sell it at reduced cost.
Yet… if they’re unable to pay with SNAP because the funding is cut off, wouldn’t that law be inapplicable?
I would say so, yes. I’m not sure a judge would say this makes sense (judges could even dismiss this based on the fact there doesn’t appear to be an injured party or they could even force the USDA to pay the difference to grocers).
Realistically grocery stores were expecting to sell a certain amount of goods to SNAP recipients and if they don’t then that food just rots. Might as well sell it at reduced cost.