If I’m reading the edit correctly, cappucino is saying that women being harrassed is a real problem in Mexico and that Morena is fucked up enough to use it as a distraction from other serious issues.
Edit; they’re also blaming the party, not her specifically. Reading up on her, I think she’s OK. The party seems corrupt though.
…yeah, you can. Are you implying that no giverment has ever performed false flag attacks?
Im not on either side of this, only learned about it yesterday. But it is a wild take to say that because you recognise a problem, you are suddenly magically incapable of looking at nuance.
I’m saying that men have groped women many orders of magnitude more frequently and Occam’s razor should apply. You can turn this into a false flag conspiracy and blame the woman who got groped, on zero evidence Just don’t claim you’re serious about women’s issues if you do. You can’t have it all.
If I’m reading the edit correctly, cappucino is saying that women being harrassed is a real problem in Mexico and that Morena is fucked up enough to use it as a distraction from other serious issues.
im not going to debate whether i stand for womens rights with you. But again, nuance.
Nice bait, but I’m not going to feed into that. I guess this conversation is over, glad to see you’ve completely abandoned your argument after realising it was wrong. Tbh it was a lot easier to convince you than i thought, but the facts stand for themselves i suppose
Completely inventing your own reality, freeform… I made my argument clear and plain. You declined to respond to it, and then declared victory. An impressive level of delusion.
If I’m reading the edit correctly, cappucino is saying that women being harrassed is a real problem in Mexico and that Morena is fucked up enough to use it as a distraction from other serious issues.
Edit; they’re also blaming the party, not her specifically. Reading up on her, I think she’s OK. The party seems corrupt though.
One cannot simultaneously say that it’s a serious issue and then dismiss an incidence of it, plain to see on camera, with a conspiracy theory.
Are you seriously saying that someone cant take a serious issue and then use that issue for their own benefit???
…yeah, you can. Are you implying that no giverment has ever performed false flag attacks?
Im not on either side of this, only learned about it yesterday. But it is a wild take to say that because you recognise a problem, you are suddenly magically incapable of looking at nuance.
I’m saying that men have groped women many orders of magnitude more frequently and Occam’s razor should apply. You can turn this into a false flag conspiracy and blame the woman who got groped, on zero evidence Just don’t claim you’re serious about women’s issues if you do. You can’t have it all.
im not going to debate whether i stand for womens rights with you. But again, nuance.
You couldn’t debate it if you tried. But your lack of trying is noted.
Nice bait, but I’m not going to feed into that. I guess this conversation is over, glad to see you’ve completely abandoned your argument after realising it was wrong. Tbh it was a lot easier to convince you than i thought, but the facts stand for themselves i suppose
Completely inventing your own reality, freeform… I made my argument clear and plain. You declined to respond to it, and then declared victory. An impressive level of delusion.
Nah, hes right. Youre an idiot, baiting him into something that doenst need to be.