• Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Hydrocsrbon chains are the most efficient way to store carbo

    Volumetric efficiency is not the relevant metric. Energy efficiency is much more important. The process you describe requires far greater energy input to complete the sequestration.

    Furthermore, the physical properties are a problem. Biomass appropriate to this process is conveyed as a flammable, pelletized solid; CO2 is an inert fluid. One of these can be pumped via pipeline into empty subterranean reservoirs; the other cannot.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Do you work for them or something? Holy shit

      Of course volumetric density is what matters. That and long term stability

      You know what is really good at storing carbon underground forever? Fossil fuels. And if they can pull it out of the ground, they should have no problem putting it back in… It’s a lot simpler