• IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Social conservatives have shown, time and again, that they won’t stop at simply refusing treatment for themselves. They want to make sure that everyone lives according to their beliefs. They will, of course, claim they are protecting children.

    • Concur6053@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      20 hours ago

      We can deal with that bridge when we cross it, but until then I’m all ears on a better option for the current issue

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        It’s easy:

        Your kid doesn’t get to participate in any public services (school, for instance) if they are not vaccinated - no non-medical exceptions. And it is illegal to refuse to educate your kid.

          • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            That used to be a thing in a lot of states - admittedly, there were some more exceptions, but generally school districts were reasonably strict about it, as a matter of public and community health. But the antivax movement took a lot of the teeth out of those mandates - so much so that many places in the US have lost their herd immunity as a result of so many idiot parents “doing their own research”.

            • Concur6053@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              I was in school when those requirements were mandatory. Truly a shame how far the us has fallen since then