One of Google Search’s oldest and best-known features, cache links, are being retired. Best known by the “Cached” button, those are a snapshot of a web page the last time Google indexed it. However, according to Google, they’re no longer required.

“It was meant for helping people access pages when way back, you often couldn’t depend on a page loading,” Google’s Danny Sullivan wrote. “These days, things have greatly improved. So, it was decided to retire it.”

  • NoRodent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Well that really sucks because it was often the only way to actually find the content on the page that the Google results “promised”. For numerous reasons - sometimes the content simply changes, gets deleted or is made inaccessible because of geo-fencing or the site is straight up broken and so on.

    Yes, there’s archive.org but believe it or not, not everything is there.

    • lauha@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      They are an Ad company, and using cached page doesn’t bring ad money to their clients

  • _number8_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    of course it is. why have anything good on there, no point reminding me of the old days when the internet was actually fucking useful

      • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Literally yesterday. What source is sufficient to tell you first hand that I used the feature yesterday?

        You want proof that it’s useful. Go look at waybackmachine. Literally millions of users using a cached web page feature.

        • Guru_Insights99@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          Photo / visual evidence would be fine, I am not picky. I would just like to be sure you are telling the truth, a lot of fraud on the internet nowadays 😒😒

  • EnderMB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    How has no one worked on a new search engine over the last decade or so where Google has been on a clear decline in its flagship product!

    I know of the likes of DDG, and Bing has worked hard to catch up, but I’m genuinely surprised that a startup hasn’t risen to find a novel way of attacking reliable web search. Some will say it’s a “solved problem”, but I’d argue that it was, but no longer.

    A web search engine that crawls and searches historic versions of a web page could be an incredibly useful resource. If someone can also find a novel way to rank and crawl web applications or to find ways to “open” the closed web, it could pair with web search to be a genuine Google killer.

    • piecat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The next revolutionary search engine will be an AI that understands you. Like what a librarian is… Not just ads served.

      • spujb@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        i don’t need a search engine that understand me i need a search engine that finds sites and pages based on a string of text i provide it

        we should be calling the future piss the way it’s going down the toilet