There’s a good crossover between the best Rugby nations and the best Cricketing nations; I’m assuming this is down to good old fashioned British colonialism?

Which leads me to wonder why Rugby never gained the same level of support in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka as it did in New Zealand, South Africa, Australia and Fiji.

Or am I totally wrong and the two things aren’t remotely related?

    • Quicky@lemmy.world
      0·
      9 months ago

      This is likely the best explanation, although there’s plenty of highly physical/athletic sports that are popular in hot countries. Football, arguably the most athletically demanding team sport, is popular in a bunch of places where I’d rather stay in the shade with a beer.

      • folkrav@lemmy.ca
        0·
        9 months ago

        I’d say football has that unique advantage that it can be played basically anywhere with anything somewhat ball shaped and bouncy. One of the most accessible sports out there. Barely any equipment required to be able to play it.

    • SbisasCostlyTurnover@feddit.ukOPEnglish
      0·
      9 months ago

      Might also explain why Cricket is so popular. Obviously it still requires a fair amount of physical exertion but it’s definitely a bit more laid back than something like Rugby.

  • 01011@monero.town
    0·
    9 months ago

    Because it’s a stupid game. Rugby “took off” in places with a significant settler/invader population, which Indian lacked (relative to the size of the Indian population). Plus, India has its own sports that are far more interesting and then there’s cricket which is a superior game of skill and tact.

    Rugby isn’t even popular in the country that birthed the game.

      • 01011@monero.town
        1·
        2 months ago

        It’s the third most popular sport, after cricket which most people that I’ve met in the UK have no interest in.

        • MrsDoyle@lemmy.world
          0·
          9 months ago

          I wish it wasn’t popular in the UK. I hail from NZ originally and everyone assumes I love rugby as much as they do. Any time there’s a big tournament on people keep trying to talk to me about bloody rugby. I hate it, HATE it. An English friend who’s a fanatic dragged me along to an All Black/Scotland test match - booooring. I don’t know anyone who isn’t at least interested in rugby, chats about the latest big game etc etc. Bloody rugby.

          Sorry to rant, but I’ve just put my car key fob through a washing machine cycle, so I’m not in a good mood.

        • Quicky@lemmy.world
          0·
          9 months ago

          And 2 million people in England are registered players. That’s 3.5% of the population. That’s just official registered players, not even fans. Your comment is absurd.

          • 01011@monero.town
            0·
            9 months ago

            That’s because they make it mandatory at certain schools in the UK, not because it’s genuinely beloved by the populace. Nobody would ever call Rugby “the people’s game”.

      • pop@lemmy.ml
        0·
        9 months ago

        The indian brigade on reddit is wild. If their lies aren’t picked up by others, anything that props up India is flooded to the top and any criticism is considered racism.

        One of the benefits of overpopulation on the internet.

  • doublejay1999@lemmy.world
    0·
    9 months ago

    Great question. My first guess would be the ground is mostly too dry and hard. It probably played a part, but doesnt explain South Africa .