db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · edit-211 months agoThe Motion Picture Association will work with Congress to start blocking piracy sites in the USlockwww.engadget.comexternal-linkmessage-square136fedilinkarrow-up1352arrow-down16
arrow-up1346arrow-down1external-linkThe Motion Picture Association will work with Congress to start blocking piracy sites in the USlockwww.engadget.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · edit-211 months agomessage-square136fedilink
minus-squareEmpricorn@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down5·11 months agoIsn’t that exactly what their point is?
minus-squarecatloaf@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·11 months agoYes. Today piracy, tomorrow “subversive” content like unionization.
minus-squareShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·11 months agoIt may not be next President/Congress or the one after that. However there will be a President/Congress that decides to broaden the firewall to “protect us”.
minus-squareDoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-211 months agoRemember 45’s AG wanted to ban encryption?
minus-squareShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·11 months agoNo, however I can imagine the reason why.
Isn’t that exactly what their point is?
Yes. Today piracy, tomorrow “subversive” content like unionization.
It may not be next President/Congress or the one after that. However there will be a President/Congress that decides to broaden the firewall to “protect us”.
Remember 45’s AG wanted to ban encryption?
No, however I can imagine the reason why.
I don’t get it