db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · edit-21 year agoThe Motion Picture Association will work with Congress to start blocking piracy sites in the USlockwww.engadget.comexternal-linkmessage-square135fedilinkarrow-up1352arrow-down16
arrow-up1346arrow-down1external-linkThe Motion Picture Association will work with Congress to start blocking piracy sites in the USlockwww.engadget.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · edit-21 year agomessage-square135fedilink
minus-squareEmpricorn@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down5·1 year agoIsn’t that exactly what their point is?
minus-squarecatloaf@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·1 year agoYes. Today piracy, tomorrow “subversive” content like unionization.
minus-squareShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoIt may not be next President/Congress or the one after that. However there will be a President/Congress that decides to broaden the firewall to “protect us”.
minus-squareDoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.comcakelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-21 year agoRemember 45’s AG wanted to ban encryption?
minus-squareShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoNo, however I can imagine the reason why.
Isn’t that exactly what their point is?
Yes. Today piracy, tomorrow “subversive” content like unionization.
It may not be next President/Congress or the one after that. However there will be a President/Congress that decides to broaden the firewall to “protect us”.
Remember 45’s AG wanted to ban encryption?
No, however I can imagine the reason why.
I don’t get it