Hey guys, what are your thoughts on the existence of extraterrestrial life and the potential involvement of governments in concealing or studying such entities.

  • LemonLord@endlesstalk.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    All the whistleblowers have testified under oath and were demonstrably employed by the aforementioned organizations. Further disregard would be arrogance. However, it’s less about “aliens” and more about additional forms of non-human intelligence. Essentially, we are facing a new paradigm in physics. This is a positive development.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      The whistleblowers are around in an amount and level of story consistency that makes me think they are grifters.

      • LemonLord@endlesstalk.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Roughly estimating, there are about 500 employees from CIA subprograms making such claims. They do so under oath and without significant financial gain. If their employer were to contradict or refute their claims, they could be prosecuted criminally in the US. This is a different quality than before, where witnesses had no connection to government agencies.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Is there a list somewhere? I’ve only heard about a handful, and according to Wikipedia the CIA only employs 21,575, so that would be quite a lot.

          If their employer were to contradict or refute their claims, they could be prosecuted criminally in the US.

          The CIA famously doesn’t confirm or deny very much.

          • LemonLord@endlesstalk.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            I don’t know about a complete list. You also have three sources. First, David Grusch mentions 80 additional witnesses. Then there’s Dr. Steven Greer, who mentions 300 to 500 witnesses in his videos. And then there’s the “To the Stars Academy,” which is said to be purely a CIA affair. I can’t imagine that in the USA you can accuse the CIA of crimes and come from the same place. So, I consider such witnesses to be of higher value. But of course, always with caution. Once CIA, always CIA. So, targeted disinformation is also possible. But the topic has already changed. No more green men, but “there’s something.” Also, how the media in the US report. Once a UFO landing in Las Vegas. Then that in the Mal in Florida. Quite interesting.

            • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Claimed witnesses mean nothing, and I have 3,000 that will back that up. /s

              Three sources. That’s what I was thinking, and their stories don’t much up or hold constant very well. It doesn’t matter what their clearance was, anybody can like dirty money (like from a book deal or appearance where they say what enthusiasts want to hear). That’s actually where most spies come from, and so why the CIA exists in the first place.

              • LemonLord@endlesstalk.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                One can perceive many things stereotypically. However, I don’t think all UFO witnesses are bought or trying to sell books. Many just want to share their story, and in the past, they were often stigmatized and marginalized. However, that’s becoming less and less common.

                • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I mean, I’ve personally seen a UFO more than once. I have no idea what they were - especially the one during a thunderstorm - but I’m pretty sure they were human, just based on who normally builds things like that.

                  I never had a little green man visit me, and to my knowledge most the cases of that read a lot like someone’s sleep disturbance or episode. The remainder are few enough I do go to lying. If one landed in a crowd in Arizona, I’d give it to you, aliens are here, but they just haven’t.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      The government stuff is more about not wanting anyone to feel like they’ll be ridiculed and their career will be over if they talk about seeing things they can’t explain in case that thing turns out to be some new technology developed by other people. And that there might be ways the laws of physics behave to make weird stuff show up that we don’t understand, so studying it could result in improvements to our understanding of physics. There’s no credible evidence of aliens that has been uncovered by any of that.

      You can see it in the renaming of UFO to UAP. UFO stands for unidentified flying object and never implied aliens were the ones flying the object. It was changed to unidentified aerial phenomenon because UFO did imply that whatever was seen was flying and an object when it could just be refracted light in some cases, which is neither flying nor an object.

      I want to believe but there isn’t a good reason to do so at this point.

      And there is non-human intelligence on earth, but outside of humans it’s only used for problem solving, communication, and basic tool use. I’m not even aware of any animal that uses tools to make other tools other than humans and maybe some of the other extinct hominids, which would be a requirement if you’re saying non-human intelligence on earth is capable of creating UAPs. Unless I’m misunderstanding what you mean.