The Supreme Court agrees that a single state doesn’t get to change a presidential ballot. The GOP’s candidate is in fact a criminal and should not be on the ballot for that alone; but that’s the best they can bring to the table.
I guess you forgot about the E. Jean Carrol case that he was found guilty in. That’s just one… I like my presidential candidates to not have criminal records.
And you’re mentioning the outcome of a Supreme Court decision that never happened. Don’t worry about the Great Replacement; you and the rest of your ilk of degenerates will still be able to find a seat at the back of the classroom indefinitely.
The entire supreme court disagrees with you.
The Supreme Court agrees that a single state doesn’t get to change a presidential ballot. The GOP’s candidate is in fact a criminal and should not be on the ballot for that alone; but that’s the best they can bring to the table.
If there are no charges there is no crime
I guess you forgot about the E. Jean Carrol case that he was found guilty in. That’s just one… I like my presidential candidates to not have criminal records.
Keeping up his hard sometimes I know, but this thread was about the supreme Court decision in regards to keeping him on the ballot.
Tunnel vision eh? Another horse with blinders. My statement yesterday was that the GOP should have put up a candidate without a criminal background.
And the DNC shouldn’t be offering up a candidate that’s enabling ethnic cleansing.
Your original comment specifically mentioned ballots
And you’re mentioning the outcome of a Supreme Court decision that never happened. Don’t worry about the Great Replacement; you and the rest of your ilk of degenerates will still be able to find a seat at the back of the classroom indefinitely.
You mean this decision that never happened?
There’s also that pesky little $454 million dollar guilty verdict around the fraud case too.
Again, absolutely nothing to do with this thread