I also reached out to them on Twitter but they directed me to this form. I followed up with them on Twitter with what happened in this screenshot but they are now ignoring me.

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    The only useful email validation is “can I get an MX from that” and “does it understand what I’m saying in that SMTP”. Anything else is someone that have too much free time.

      • vithigar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Definitely a timesaver. Much faster to get incorrect email validation that way then to try building it yourself.

        • Archer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Skip the building step and go straight to pulling your hair out over why it’s not working! Efficiency!

      • felbane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I know (hope) you’re being facetious, because the objectively best way to do email validation is to send a fuckin email to the provided address.

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        That probably lead to this exchange.

        Stack Overflow is useful, but…it needs more than a little parsing for useful answers.