ElCanut@jlai.lu to solarpunk memes@slrpnk.net · 1 year agoBaybe what's wrong? You've barely touched your Strawberrumjlai.luimagemessage-square76fedilinkarrow-up1549arrow-down18
arrow-up1541arrow-down1imageBaybe what's wrong? You've barely touched your Strawberrumjlai.luElCanut@jlai.lu to solarpunk memes@slrpnk.net · 1 year agomessage-square76fedilink
minus-squareEven_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoIt can’t see what tokens it puts out, you would need additional passes on the output for it to get it right. It’s computationally expensive, so I’m pretty sure that didn’t happen here.
minus-squareJesusaurus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoWith the amount of processing it takes to generate the output, a simple pass over the to-be final output would make sense…
minus-squareramirezmike@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agodoesn’t it work literally by passing in everything it said to determine what the next word is?
minus-squareadderaline@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoit chunks text up into tokens, so it isn’t processing the words as if they were composed from letters.
It can’t see what tokens it puts out, you would need additional passes on the output for it to get it right. It’s computationally expensive, so I’m pretty sure that didn’t happen here.
With the amount of processing it takes to generate the output, a simple pass over the to-be final output would make sense…
doesn’t it work literally by passing in everything it said to determine what the next word is?
it chunks text up into tokens, so it isn’t processing the words as if they were composed from letters.