• Infamousblt [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    More of that capitalist innovation I keep hearing about huh. Finding innovative new ways to stop new technology that threatens their business from reaching a broader market! Great job

    • Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well to be fair, trying to sell anything with the word mini in it in America is it uphill struggle; if there’s one thing us Americans hate, it’s walking uphill.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        You say that as if Americans don’t want kei cars, but we do. Even rural off-roading Youtubers (who would probably be revealed to be ultraconservative if they didn’t keep their politics out of their videos) love things like Suzuki Samurais and Subaru Sambars.

        • possibly a cat@lemmy.mlB
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          They can usually be imported for private use, but kei cars aren’t street legal for most consumer purposes in the US. Which means they would be selling to a very small market. The very few that end up getting sold in Europe are usually modified versions designed for export is another limiting factor.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            but kei cars aren’t street legal for most consumer purposes in the US

            Speak for your own state.

        • possibly a cat@lemmy.mlB
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is a small market for kei cars, for private use and export. But the economies of scale required for making these top-sellers don’t exist without regulatory and tax reform in foreign markets.

          • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Maybe in the US, but in Asia, a huge portion of sales for Honda, Toyota and Suzuki are for their modified kei cars. Even so, they still don’t seem interested in releasing their electric models there. This gap is currently filled by Chinese EV manufacturers.

  • suoko@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    And people don’t really care about it . Let the wheel spin and get as much as you can while you ride, don’t think about next drivers.

  • dropped_the_chief@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    We’re all going to fry in old age. Our children are going to become sterile. Who tf knows what’s going to happen to whatever ppl make it past that.

  • groundling20XX [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Japan in japan sabotages cars. The real issue is that Japan went deep on hydrogen power combined with the large increase in electric prices after 3/11 any future of electric car died for the Japanese domestic market. Toyota in particular put its money in hydrogen buses, cars and other things which lead to a galaoagos tech like half of the rest of the crap in japan. Theres also some general resistance to electric over the past decade to create a parallel technology stack to china which fizzled out.

  • 3volver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This shit actually hurts my soul. This is the type of shit as to why we might not make it. We have the technology to mitigate climate change yet we don’t because those in power don’t want to see their power decrease. It’s a serious reason why we might not make it. How do we even begin to take direct action? I really have no clue, this entire planet, life as we know it, is entirely fucked if we don’t do something soon. The US government gave billions to implement charging infrastructure and the corps did jack SHIT with it, the government has become the corps fuck pig, bent over dishing out money while getting fucked.

    • LappingDog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is there a number on the break even point where it’s better for the environment to buy a new EV than to keep driving an old ICE vehicle? I bike most days when I don’t need to buy more than a backpack of groceries or go more than 3 miles. Surely when you consider the carbon cost of refining materials and constructing a whole new vehicle, it doesn’t make sense in most situations for people who drive less than 30 minutes a day on average. This is of course assuming you have a current vehicle, new vehicles should have to be hybrid/EV in the modern era.

      • hglman@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Certainly correct, we still need a path to direct action and it needs to be everywhere.

        • daemoz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Technology isn’t going to save humanity. Greatly reducing population size by limiting reproduction is the only chance for a long future for humans. Thats the most direct path, but also at odds with all of our forms of government and economics. China couldt afford to keep doing it and they understand this. Its the same with the earths ecology. We would need a massive enlightening and there are far too many material and lifestyle choices and campaigns to sway people away from our staus quo. Humanity is doomed by human greed and jealousy, it always was. But thats fine, once you come to terms with it, and if you caught it before having kids, its a pretty freeing understanding.

            • daemoz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              you are wrong, nowhere am I advocating for anything. I’m saying human overpopulation will lead to our doom. This response is why I don’t really care about sustainability anymore. I’m not having kids, feel free to keep your head buried in the sand. Asshat

    • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      bro we’re so far past this lol

      it’s been too late for probably a decade now, get ready to starve cuz there’s only a couple years left

    • set_secret@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Might not make it? Sorry man we’re literally looking down the barrel of end times.

      Human greed can only be stopped when the earth has nothing left to give.

      This is the reality we all exist in and 99% of us are powerless to change it, unless we all collectively agree to (spoiler we’re not gunna).

      • 3volver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nah, we’re not powerless, and we don’t all have to collectively agree. We have so many technologies that have been developed over the past several decades that can help solve this problem. Change is constant, this kind of shit is just another bump in the road.

        • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          this kind of shit is just another bump in the road.

          I assume you are younger.

          I am in my 50s. The risk of this shit was known and tought to children in schools in the 1980s.

          Yet at every level. Things have gotten worse. We had solar in the 80s. Less efficient but only about 15% rather then the 20% we see now. But tax payer money in all western democracy. Was still funding oil research not batts wind or solar.

          Cars became bigger and less efficient as we watched. GM was known to have destroyed its own ev production pack in the 90s.

          Nothing at all was invested in building inferstructure to support other fuel types. Again dispite huge public investment in oil.

          And at every 0ossible point. What little that was done was aimed at indeviduals who have the least control. While corperations were allowed to keep expanding there use. Without facing any of the costs for replacement.

          Its a bump. But a 40plus year bump built intentionally to slow and limit changes in the way wealth is made.

          With so much false science and outright lies from corperations its insane.

          Exxon the plastics industry and many other. Behaived much worse the the cigarette industry did before them. And have not had to pay anything for there intentional and informed damage to billions of lives. Where as at least in nations with real health care options. Tobbaco companies have lost lawsuits and paid a fortune since discovery.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The tariffs were explicitly to protect them. To prevent them from having to compete. We’re about to eat a lot of shit.

          • buzz86us@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            The issue I’m seeing here is that there isn’t anything to protect legacy auto does not make a product that is remotely comparable

  • VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nothing surprising.

    EVs have been developed since the 90s at least as far as I know, and progress on them has been sabotaged at nearly every turn by the industry.

    • Baphomet_The_Blasphemer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I remember an early Saturn EV that was never sold, only leased so GM could maintain ownership of them. Even with a limited range, the drivers all loved them for commuting and running errands, and many tried to purchase them outright, which GM refused. Eventually, GM issued a mandatory recall for all the Saturn EVs, mothballed the project, and then they released the Hummer… made me sick even at the time.

      • VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wasn’t aware of that. My thoughts were more towards the EV1, although I assume there were many others before that.

        • Resonosity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          They’re referring to how Thomas Edison created the first electric vehicles back in the 1800s. They might have had a future until Ford introduced assembly lines. Then the rest is history.

          The EV1 was the first commercial development in the US following the World Wars, but even before then you had solar EVs being made for science and eclectic racing before then. Think of those weirdly shaped cars only made for 1 driver that have solar panels covering the entire body of the car.

          Funny thing is that we’re now seeing some commercial (or soon to be commercial) manufacturers add solar panels in the same way. Just look to Hyundai and Aptera.

  • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Now that we’ve trained the whole world in american-style corporate criminality, we’re gonna pull the rug out from them and reveal ourselves to be the good guys! Right? Right, guys?