Two recent verdicts have now left Donald Trump on the hook for nearly half a billion dollars.

On Friday, a New York judge handed the former president a $355 million penalty, and banned him from serving in a leadership position in any business in New York for three years, for fraudulently inflating his net worth to lenders in order to receive more favorable loan agreements. And in January, a Manhattan jury ordered Trump to pay the writer E. Jean Carroll $83.3 million for defaming her after she accused him of raping her. (A separate jury in May had found Trump liable for sexually abusing Carroll in the 1990s.)

“It’s pretty scary from an ethics perspective,” said Virginia Canter, the chief ethics counsel at the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a nonpartisan watchdog group that has chronicled Trump’s abuses of power and filed lawsuits against him.

You don’t have to look far to find the reasons why. Trump’s first term was riddled with conflicts of interest, and that’s in no small part because of his financial well-being (or lack thereof, depending on how you look at it). At the time that he tried to overturn the 2020 election, he was hundreds of millions of dollars in debt, largely stemming from loans to help rehabilitate his struggling businesses, and most of which would be coming due over the subsequent four years. Throughout his presidency, he refused to divest from his businesses, which made millions of dollars in revenue from taxpayers and continued to do work with other countries while he was in office — a practice he indicated he would repeat in a second term.

  • spider@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    From Thursday:

    Donald Trump has doubled down on his threat to undermine Nato, saying “we’re not going to protect” allied countries he believes do not pay enough to maintain the alliance if he returns to the White House next year.

    Meanwhile, this f**king deadbeat gets Secret Service protection for life, funded by U.S. taxpayers.

    • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Sure would save us some money if we’d throw the crook in jail. I know he’d still have SS there, but I’d imagine it would be way cheaper.

      • spider@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Factoring in the number of people who claim they’ll piss on his grave, they might need SS there, too.