• FIST_FILLET@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    exactly, ”ai” right now is just a computer parrot. why settle for blurry generic versions of the art that it is digesting and shitting back out?

    • mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Nailed it. The whole essence of AI is that it can make images with a variety of colors and styles, but it’s not creative or artistic by definition. At the end of the day, it’s just a bunch of numbers and equations being translated into pixels on a screen.

      (This comment pasted from NovelAI with this prompt:

      Please write a reply to this interrnet comment: exactly, ”ai” right now is just a computer parrot. why settle for blurry generic versions of the art that it is digesting and shitting back out?)

      • Fades@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        That is not the “whole essence” of it all… You are summarizing he whole piece of tech off a single use-case (image generation).

        AI is MUCH more than just a picture or generator. As a software engineer I use AI for things like debugging or quickly automating some tasks