Not with that attitude.

I really don’t believe either of those things will do anything at all.

The difference is that guns have only one purpose.

People can get hurt during an accident while using a tool, but for a gun, something gets hurt every time it’s used as intended.

I don’t think we should be using power tool regulations for guns.

My list of suggestions for regulations does not mean that some of them aren’t already in effect.

As for the rest: ok.

Da fuq?

Impossible!

I’m not against gun ownership, but it needs to be regulated.

Compare it to your car. You need to prove your ability with a test, carry your license with you, register your vehicle, and in some places, it must pass an annual safety inspection. We do all this just to get to work and back, but I can stop at one of many stores within 10 miles of my house and buy armfuls of military hardware designed to do nothing but kill.

Handguns, shotguns and hunting rifles are all you need. Small magazines, no burst or fully automatics. Everything gets registered.

Some extra context: There are a LOT of areas in the US that are rural enough that wildlife is a serious threat, and hunting is a sustainable option for meat. It makes no sense to tell those people they can’t have one.

I think I’ve only ever seen 2 or 3 places in my life that didn’t have physical menus. I didn’t walk out of the ones that didn’t, but I haven’t been back to any of them.

I don’t know what library books have to do with any of this.

Noneday, one-day, twosday, thirdsday, wait.

What?!?

It doesn’t mean that you must supply me with everything I demand?!?!

I think being totally against a convicted felon rapist who is actively dismantling the protections that have been in the Construction for centuries and constantly finding ways to line his pocket is totally within reason.

Once he bites the big one, we’ll start hearing horror stories from his flunkies that are no longer afraid to tell the truth, but it won’t amount to anything at that point, as MAGA still won’t believe any of it.

The only reason I can think of for that rule is to prevent people from posting something that’s very agreeable and then changing it to something terrible once it has thousands of upvotes, and making it look like many people support the terrible statement.

Wow. I was expecting similarity, but not the exact same song!

There’s definitely copyright infringement here, but not by you!

The copycat probably flew under the radar since they have so few views, but if it gets any more attention, they are seriously at risk for a lawsuit.

I say appeal with “This music is not in my video” because it’s not.

That’s dirty. If the company is deciding that you can’t stay around long enough to vest those stocks, they should pay them out. There should never be a reward for dumping people.

I have a credit card that’s gotten out of control. I haven’t been able to make a decent payment on it in a while, so the balance is growing faster than I’m paying it. Finally decided to just get a flat loan to pay it off completely so it doesn’t milk me dry.

You could try covering it with hairspray. That’s what we used to keep our charcoals from getting everywhere in art school.

It should eventually wash away, but might help some.

Yay for success, I guess?

So THAT’S where that comes from!!!