deleted by creator
私、気になります!
deleted by creator
Install Windows again, then install Linux.
Windows is annoying with it’s bootloader, but when you have separate drive, it would be way smoother experience.
TIL you can do that with udisksctl. How can you do that?
I usually just use dd or Ventoy.
A. Where Loonix
B. You don’t really have to buy a license, you can use it with the activation watermark.
Not a DE but a WM, but i3.
In the future, probably Cosmic, because I like Gnome’s aesthetic and I prefer something lighter, and because I like i3’s worklow.
Only if your banana turns green and looks like jelly.
The world if we could use wildcards on ADB push/pull directly…
Like I said in the post on c/archlinux, I had more problems on ‘user-friendly’ distros, than I had on Arch.
Take something user-friendly, like Linux Mint, or Fedora.
I’d go Arch, I think it answers on most of your points.
OFC like on every rolling releases you’ll might risk having problems after not updating too long.
If you have NetworkManager installed (you should have), you can use nmtui
, TUI tool.
TUI is <u>T</u>erminal <u>U</u>ser <u>I</u>nterface, and IMO very user-friendly.
They said, it’s GrapheneOS.
In Pop!_OS, you have the Pop!_Shop, and they added their own repos for software aren’t included in Ubuntu’s repo or exist mainly as Snap packages; they also included Flathub.
Under the app name you want to install, you’ll have a little drop-down box with option to choose (if there’s more than one option) where to download the package from.
‘On my machine it works’ is not a strong argument, and is highly unlikely, due to the language it was written in.
Pacman is written in C, APT in C++, DNF in Python, and Zypper in C++ as well.
So, no. Pacman ‘wins’.
What truly matters is which tool is best suited for your use case.
> Me, a fake Arch user who never installed both of them
I’d also suggest, like other commenters here, to learn CLI tools, CMD and PowerShell commands, and DiskPart too.
For me, the fastest way to learn is by playing with it, and it sounds like you’re the same.
If you prefer to avoid installing it ‘bare metal’, you can have it on a VM.
I’d suggest specifically QEMU, or VirtualBox.
QEMU, because of the performance, and VB, for its universality, and cross-platform compatibility.
Honesty? Nowadays Linux is just easier for me.
Sometimes you forget that a lot of tools you are use to have in Linux don’t even exist on Windows (like watch
and cut
). On Windows there are some problems you don’t even have to deal with on Unix-like systems.
If it’s on the same drive, after updates, Windows will try to ‘fix’
that you have another OSitself, and remove GRUB.