Sometimes, the point of research is to experimentally prove things we suspect are true.
Sometimes, the point of research is to experimentally prove things we suspect are true.
It’s Mewroo!
I’m guessing from his “don’t fuck with me” expression, that’s a cigar
Niccol will still be expected to work from the Seattle office at least three days a week
Except when he’s flying around the country/world to other locations.
Muscles are broken down during use and repaired / built during rest.
(same stove, pot and everything)
Yes, OP agrees.
I loved seeing the chain method of architectural engineering!
Legally easier to ignore a ghost department.
Especially since it specifically highlights porn in a different color, it labeled my VPN IP as “Likes Porn”.
You just need to do an aggressive head nod at the barista and you’ll get a slightly bigger portion.
Where’s your encrypted USB recovery key stored?! Is it encrypted USBs all the way down?
Odd coming from someone who is fucking retired.
I’d suspect he sacrificed work-life balance his whole career (yes, CEOs are known for golfing and vacations, but I bet they still think of work 24/7). So just like people complaining about student loan forgiveness, some people get so angry if they perceive someone might have an easier experience than they did.
It’s a very searchable name
No, I’ve seen this before. One whack to the head changes someone, but then another whack changes them back. Same principle.
Everyone with long covid just needs more covid to fix it.
Nice haul! This was our first year with success at carrots, but our orange batch was much more productive than the multi-color. Both tasted excellent
The US sent 592 athletes and competed in 34 events.
China sent 388 athletes for 33 events.
Of course, algorithms! The answer was right there all along!
I think you’re getting downvotes because you’re projecting a narrative onto @Reyali and using quotes around non-quotes. They didn’t say they were “probably not right.”
I agree, everyone should be skeptical of information someone else is sharing, because we can’t assume intention. But what would motivate someone to say “I’m probably not right” anyway?
What’s interesting to me is that for you, your guard went up for someone admitting a potential of having missed something, which may make you more susceptible to people who are confidently wrong.
Most others’ reaction is the opposite, taking their statement as an attempt to be genuine and open to feedback. If someone invites feedback, is willing to admit they might be wrong, that’s a much better starting point for conversation.
Yep, that’s what the linked articles’ conclusion was. But 80dB vs 120dB is a huge difference, jackhammer compared to a dishwasher. Anyway, I’m out of my depth, I shot a bow last 30 years ago. And never as a stealthy assassin nor archery-based superhero.
Thanks for the tip, I’m trying to be google-free, so I’m testing it out. A little too late for election season, oh well