I’m not trained in formal computer science, so I’m unable to evaluate the quality of this paper’s argument, but there’s a preprint out that claims to prove that current computing architectures will never be able to advance to AGI, and that rather than accelerating, improvements are only going to slow down due to the exponential increase in resources necessary for any incremental advancements (because it’s an NP-hard problem). That doesn’t prove LLMs are end of the line, but it does suggest that additional improvements are likely to be marginal.
The one colleague using AI at my company produced (CUDA) code with lots of memory leaks that required two expert developers to fix. LLMs produce code based on vibes instead of following language syntax and proper coding practices. Maybe that would be ok in a more forgiving high level language, but I don’t trust them at all for low level languages.
Are you able to share what kinds of applications and what languages you write in? I’m still trying to grasp why LLM programming assistants seem popular despite the flaws I see in them, so I’m trying to understand the cases where they do work.
For example, my colleague was writing CUDA code to simulate optical physics, so it’s possible that the LLM’s failure was due in part to the niche application and a language that is unforgiving of deviations from the one correct way of writing things.
The only person in my company using AI to code writes stuff with tons of memory leaks that require two experienced programmers to fix. (To be fair, I don’t think he included “don’t have memory leaks” in the prompt.)
Sigh, another major thinker who totally misunderstands LLMs and their capabilities. The fact that he cites Musk as a credible source on “AI” says it all.
The wealthy passengers shouldn’t have depended on the crew to rescue them; that’s socialism. They should just pull themselves out of the water by their bootstraps.
/s
Who’s said bye to DVDs?
Because it reports sources known to be unreliable (like Jerusalem Post and EuroNews) as Highly Trustworthy
Christianity doesn’t follow Jesus; it follows Paul. The “Christ” part is marketing.
As an American I’m newly flabbergasted by this every damn day
They probably did think of it but then rejected it when they found out how progressive Jesus is
Fuck israel
without compromising on visual fidelity
But it does compromise. Netflix has the worst banding issues in low-light scenes of any of the streaming services I’ve tried. It’s hard not to notice and it’s very annoying.
First useful thing Elon ever did
Yeah Startpage and Ecosia too
“Aren’t I”, as in “I’m still going with you, aren’t I?”, which, when uncontracted, becomes “are I not?” It should be “ain’t I” since “ain’t” is a proper contraction for “amn’t”, but there’s been an irrational suppression of “ain’t”.
rossia is dumb
That is the neutral answer. It’s objectively and demonstrably correct.
Reservations aren’t part of her state; they’re sovereign territory of the nations that live there