You have to account for these cases in your rules.
Why? They can’t afford an employee. They shouldn’t hire one.
You have to account for these cases in your rules.
Why? They can’t afford an employee. They shouldn’t hire one.


Regurgitating unverified AI output is not useful. I asked chatgpt, it’s from Grim Adventures of Billy and Mandy. Oh, it doesn’t appear in that show? Sorry, it’s actually Amazing World Of Gumball. Not there either? Sorry, it’s actually a werewolf from an obscure animation Scary Larry. Not even remotely the same at style? That’s because it’s actually from this 3d animation. Obviously 2d? Sorry, it’s actually Midnight Mass. Then it got stuck in a loop.
I’ve never thought of it that way but you’re absolutely right, getting kicked out of one niche internet community is literally the same thing as genocide! Nobody has ever had it worse than this guy.


On your end there’s not much to consider here. You can let them know they refunded the entire order, chances are they’ll just write it off. If they ask you to send it back it should be entirely at their expense, do not pay to send it back.
On their end there’s more going on. It sounds like they charged you for an item they knowingly did not ship then claimed the refund was already in progress when you complained. They also gave you a damaged item and claimed to be unable to refund that, which in most developed countries would be a breach of consumer regulations. This sounds an awful lot like that company is attempting to scam people.


I’m not convinced you understand what transitioning means. You can start transitioning without any medical intervention, and pretty much every trans person does socially transition before medical treatment because there’s really no alternative. When a younger person starts medical treatment, it will consist of puberty blockers. That’s it. Fully reversible, no known long-term side-effects, been used for 50 years for cis kids with precocious puberty. Suggesting that’s in any way equivalent to someone permanently deafening themselves is pretty disgusting, it’s typical terf bullshit and you should really think twice about whatever led you to that opinion.
Final Destination?


dumb enough to think that something you just thought of without any research is valid and also dumb enough to think sharing that online is a good idea.
Do you know what community you’re posting in?
You can disagree with someone without being an ass, this was uncalled for.

UK and England are not synonyms. This is England behind the curve as usual and updating regulation to catch up, you already need id for energy drinks elsewhere in the UK.


You mean like all the things in the link OP posted which you scrolled past just to be an ass in the comments?


So your suggestion is instead of any attempt at regulation people should just boycott a company years after they’ve already given that company their money, despite the fact that you admit n even more ideal circumstances boycotts still do not work?


The entire premise of your comment is absurd, but let’s assume for a moment we really do live in a world where a legal process can’t be used unless it’s successfully been used for widespread change before; what other action do you suggest people should take?


Imagine superman barging into your home with two rich kids just to say “look at this shithole, can you believe people actually live like this?” He excludes the kid he wants the others to include, too.


Plenty of words mean the opposite of themselves, so much so that there’s multiple words for it; autoantonym, contranym, or Janus words.
This morning my alarm went off so I turned it off.
I wanted to buy a new console as soon as it was out but they were all out.
Two people were left so I left.
I fought with Bob over chores, but I fought with Bob in the war.
Sort of, but but really. You’re right that historically the daylight hours set an upper limit on the amount of work that can be done per week for most types of work, but that limit is far higher than 8 hours per day over 5 days. The 40 hour work week is based on unions fighting for a 40 hour work week. If it wasn’t for the unions you’d be working all day every day except Sunday, for religious reasons.
That might change over the next few decades too, the current fight is for a 4 day work week and studies are showing promising results there.


I think you’re misrepresenting that a little. It’s not peer reviewed, doesn’t appear to have any researchers names attached at all, doesn’t mention latent demand, and doesn’t at any point consider that there could be other modes of transport. It reads to me like someone trying to sell their road building project.


There’s plenty of examples of software doing this right and displaying each language in the selector in that language, it’s hard to say why they’ve localised it here. Most likely they just didn’t consider how the user interacts with that element and localised it the same way they translate everything else, but that could be down to anyone from the developer habitually running everything through localisation to company policy where they couldn’t get an exception for that element.
You’d have to ask support for whatever software you’re using for more detail, chances are you won’t get anything useful back but if you’re lucky they might fix it.


The question reads like an XY problem, they describe DB functions for data structures so unless there’s some specific reason they can’t use a DB that’s the right answer. A “spreadsheet for data structures” describes a relational database.
But they need rectangular structure. How do they work on tree structures, like OP has asked?
Relationships. You don’t dump all your data in a single table. Take for instance the following sample JSON:
"users": [
{
"id": 1,
"name": "Alice",
"email": "alice@example.com",
"favorites": {
"games": [
{
"title": "The Witcher 3",
"platforms": [
{
"name": "PC",
"release_year": 2015,
"rating": 9.8
},
{
"name": "PS4",
"release_year": 2015,
"rating": 9.5
}
],
"genres": ["RPG", "Action"]
},
{
"title": "Minecraft",
"platforms": [
{
"name": "PC",
"release_year": 2011,
"rating": 9.2
},
{
"name": "Xbox One",
"release_year": 2014,
"rating": 9.0
}
],
"genres": ["Sandbox", "Survival"]
}
]
}
},
{
"id": 2,
"name": "Bob",
"email": "bob@example.com",
"favorites": {
"games": [
{
"title": "Fortnite",
"platforms": [
{
"name": "PC",
"release_year": 2017,
"rating": 8.6
},
{
"name": "PS5",
"release_year": 2020,
"rating": 8.5
}
],
"genres": ["Battle Royale", "Action"]
},
{
"title": "Rocket League",
"platforms": [
{
"name": "PC",
"release_year": 2015,
"rating": 8.8
},
{
"name": "Switch",
"release_year": 2017,
"rating": 8.9
}
],
"genres": ["Sports", "Action"]
}
]
}
}
]
}
You’d structure that in SQL tables something like this:
dbo.users
| user_id | name | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alice | alice@example.com |
| 2 | Bob | bob@example.com |
dbo.games
| game_id | title | genre |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Witcher 3 | RPG |
| 2 | Minecraft | Sandbox |
| 3 | Fortnite | Battle Royale |
| 4 | Rocket League | Sports |
dbo.favorites
| user_id | game_id |
|---|---|
| 1 | 1 |
| 1 | 2 |
| 2 | 3 |
| 2 | 4 |
dbo.platforms
| platform_id | game_id | name | release_year | rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | PC | 2015 | 9.8 |
| 2 | 1 | PS4 | 2015 | 9.5 |
| 3 | 2 | PC | 2011 | 9.2 |
| 4 | 2 | Xbox One | 2014 | 9.0 |
| 5 | 3 | PC | 2017 | 8.6 |
| 6 | 3 | PS5 | 2020 | 8.5 |
| 7 | 4 | PC | 2015 | 8.8 |
| 8 | 4 | Switch | 2017 | 8.9 |
The dbo.favorites table handles the many-to-many relationship between users and games; users can have as many favourite games as they want, and multiple users can have the same favourite game. The dbo.platforms handles one-to-many relationships; each record in this table represents a single release, but each game can have multiple releases on different platforms.


Usually no, unless I’ve left a reply disagreeing then someone else comes along and downvotes them, makes me look like an ass who downvotes anyone I disagree with. I also check my own comments to see if people agree with me but I’ll keep the comment up either way, if I do change my mind I’d rather leave a new comment or add stuff in an edit.
It’s not too difficult to bot votes on lemmy so they’re even more pointless than they are on reddit.
No you didn’t. You only said that a company that can’t afford “25/hr” would be unable to hire people at that rate. Plus an offhand comment about how some people working full time “cannot be justified” earning a living wage, that’s the point you seemingly want to make but just stating something isn’t an explanation.