• TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    No, I understand what you said but I think.

    No, you don’t.

    It’s not even argumentative, it’s just confusingly misplaced.

    Only if you live in an ahistorical vacuum with no appreciation of nuance or context. And maybe you are coming to this conversation in that manner, so keep in mind this is a forum specifically for discussion politics, and the people having conversations here may have far more context and depth to what they are saying than you may at first notice.

    • scarabine@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      How is that a defense of your non sequitur post above? I don’t think digging at me is going to brute force that first comment into context.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        a defense of your non sequitur post above

        Its not a defense because there was no non-sequiter; just you not understanding nuance and context.

            • scarabine@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              I think it’s more that you really wanted to vent about this vote withholding thing? And you’re looking for ways to bring it up. I mean just bring it up, right? Why make it like you’re responding to someone you’re not really even talking to?