• Kryptenx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    This is why so much money is being pumped into AI. This is the future and our politicians are too old to understand any of it. It isn’t sentience you should be worried about folks.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yup too many people worry about what happens after AI gains sentience. When we need to worry about what happens before.

      • AeroLemming@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s because what happens post-singularity is dramatic and flashy, but what’s happening now is depressing and boring. AI is being used and will continue to be used to oppress people and extract as much value from them as possible, but post-singularity AI might launch all the nukes!

        In all likelihood, post-singularity AI will probably just do what current AI does to screw people over, but even better.

        • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Ironically post-singularity AIs might be more like Master Computer from Tron. Just believing they are super efficient and can run things better. But to whose benefit?

        • gandalf_der_12te@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I have the vision that AI will eventually replace all the CEOs, being even more efficient than them at whatever their job is. This means even more exploitation of workers, hoarding of wealth, and putting profits above all else. The true nightmare. I think that AI will eventually turn all corporations into pure evil, and turn all humans against AI and therefore corporations. That will result in a civil war - humans vs machines. Eventually, humans will be able to save themselves, but only by putting capitalism and the system of ever rising profits to the grave for good.

          • AeroLemming@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I think you’re giving humans too much credit. If our future ends up going down that path, the people raking in profits will never give up their power and the government won’t force them. Mass surveillance will make any resistance effort futile.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      This is not AI. You don’t need AI to create a system that does this. All you need to do is link together some customer data with pricing data.

      But I don’t blame you for falling for the scam. People are getting rich by pretending that AI is much more capable than it actually is. In reality, what do we have? We have systems that can generate text that sounds fairly natural but has lots of errors in it. We have systems that can generate pictures that look okay. That’s about it. That’s what AI has given us in the past 2 years. All of the other stuff, all of the formulas and databases and spreadsheets, that’s been around for decades.

      • Kryptenx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Taken too literally to this post in a vacuum, yes. Taken with the news that Kroger was thinking about dynamic pricing, don’t delude yourself into thinking LLMs are the extent of what the “AI” (stupid term but let’s discuss ideas and not the words) goals are. The real ultimate goal is to be able to mine the near infinite amount of consumer data available and turn that into increased profits. Dynamic pricing will be a piece of it and I believe this cartoon illustrates a piece of a complex subject in an easy to digest manner.

        You and I both agree that LLMs aren’t shit except for a narrow window of usefulness, mainly a distraction, and the data shows consumers don’t really like “AI”. So why is there still so much cash in “AI”? Maybe you think it’s a market pump, but there is cash in nvda because it’s undeniable GPUs will continue to be utilized in huge numbers for server farms crunching associations. There is cash in the LLM gatekeepers because those firms are large enough and far enough along the path to eventually do what filthy capitalists want with this data. First it was algorithms that prioritized engagement at any cost. Today it is LLMs. And tomorrow it is machine learning on your data and subconscious psychology in order to extract maximum profit possible from you. They’ve milked data-based advertising to the point of diminishing returns and the next step is to exploit us all using the data most make freely available out of convenience so that line continue to go up. I sure hope I’m wrong, but I’m a filthy fucking capitalist and don’t think that’s the case.

        Hope to fuck we instill decent judges across this country in the coming years because honestly our best hope is to outlaw most of these practices by showing that they can’t be free of unintended bias and are therefore inherently not objective enough to be used to set prices, etc. it works in a physical store but how do you prevent dynamic pricing online? Especially with an internet that looks like it will become extremely segmented

    • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      That and the systematic replacement of middle management by AI with no regard to human feelings, needs, emotion whatsoever. Pretty much what Amazon is doing to its delivery drivers already.

    • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Bro this isn’t AI this is a fucking basic sorting table. I hate how fucking every computer science is “AI” now.

      The only novel aspect might be trying to run facial recognition on you, which still isnt AI.

      • flerp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        You’re thinking about ‘general AI’

        Just plain old AI includes the ability to analyze data and make recommendations which this is. Therefore this falls under the broad definition of AI.