return2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 year agoKamala Harris told Teamsters president she'd win "with you or without you"www.newsweek.comexternal-linkmessage-square18linkfedilinkarrow-up179arrow-down134cross-posted to: news@lemmy.world
arrow-up145arrow-down1external-linkKamala Harris told Teamsters president she'd win "with you or without you"www.newsweek.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square18linkfedilinkcross-posted to: news@lemmy.world
minus-squareDeadWorldWalking@lemmy.blahaj.zoneBannedlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down6·1 year agoThis unironically. The Neoliberals have shown they are incapable of representing their voters anymore. We need a progressive party
minus-squareagamemnonymous@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down6·edit-21 year agoThere are multiple progressive parties. Edit: Why the downvotes? This is objectively true. We need one of our existing progressive parties to actually get votes, we don’t need another new party to split votes.
minus-squareDeadWorldWalking@lemmy.blahaj.zoneBannedlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·1 year agoAnd these are the takeaways
minus-squareJerkface (any/all)@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-28 days agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareaesthelete@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoFor president? I highly doubt she’d try again.
This unironically.
The Neoliberals have shown they are incapable of representing their voters anymore.
We need a progressive party
There are multiple progressive parties.
Edit: Why the downvotes? This is objectively true. We need one of our existing progressive parties to actually get votes, we don’t need another new party to split votes.
The election is over…
And these are the takeaways
Removed by mod
For president? I highly doubt she’d try again.