A good intelligence body will take information from all sources available. It’s their job to analyze that and build a narrative that has a confidence level. It’s what they do.
Then why did this “intelligence body” not have any information about anti-palenstian sources? Shouldn’t it be their job to analyze and build a narrative that has a confidence level?
The issue is that US police are acting on only one type of information in a conflict with two groups.
They should be pursuing anti-semitism. They should also be pursuing anti-palensteinsim. The aren’t doing the latter, and seem to actually be specifically targeting Palestinian Americas.
A good intelligence body will take information from all sources available. It’s their job to analyze that and build a narrative that has a confidence level. It’s what they do.
Then why did this “intelligence body” not have any information about anti-palenstian sources? Shouldn’t it be their job to analyze and build a narrative that has a confidence level?
The issue is that US police are acting on only one type of information in a conflict with two groups.
They should be pursuing anti-semitism. They should also be pursuing anti-palensteinsim. The aren’t doing the latter, and seem to actually be specifically targeting Palestinian Americas.
How do you know they were not getting any information and how do you know they could get good information to begin?
This is not like the news where you are suppose to get balanced reports. That is goofy to think that. If validated, you use the information you get.