• boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Probably just the extra cost of linkage and maybe risk of tripping over it

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Designing foot-operated things tends to fly in the face of modern accessibility standards. Wheelchair users already have enough problems using public toilets.

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        They can still have both. A foot pedal for those who want it, a standard handle for those who don’t or can’t. In fact, retrofitting existing handle-flush toilets to add foot pedals could make a lot of sense.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Oh shit, I guess that’s true, yeah. Wheelchair bathrooms are there own thing but not every place has them, at least where I live.

    • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I assume lack of demand. In your own home, you’d be keeping the handle clean, and public washrooms often use the touchless sensor types.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        and public washrooms often use the touchless sensor types.

        Now. I’m guessing you only have to go back to 2000 for that to be a futuristic new thing, though, while the history of the modern flush toilet goes back to the Victorian era.