Van Hollen and Booker showing how representatives in government should be working for their constituents. I hope their aim is to be as annoying as possible until something good comes of it, but I worry Bukele will just arrest them and further erode the numbers we have in Congress.

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Correct, although I imagine they don’t want to risk the optics of coming to the rescue of everyone only to find out after a court case that at least one of those people were actually guilty, even though you’d have saved hundreds from wrongful imprisonment and stood up for the constitution.

    Voters are just too dumb, I guess.

    • vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think 14 (ish) of them were actually charged with a crime, although none of them had a trial, let alone were found guilty and sentenced. And even if they were found guilty of something, I’m pretty sure locking someone up indefinitely in a foreign torture prison/slave labor camp qualifies for the 8th Amendment’s prohibition on “cruel and unusual punishment.”

      There is no legal or moral justification for sending even the most hardened convicted criminal there.

      • taiyang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, like I said it’s mostly optics because a reasonable person should know this isn’t ok in general, but the common voter isn’t reasonable. At least that’s how I interpret it. Thanks for bringing up the specific number, too.

        • jerakor@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          There is also the legality of it and if it is treasonous. The one person at least the senators have some saftey nets from the Supreme Court but they still are at risk here.

    • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I mean that would be a win. You can show why due process is important and that justice is served with it.

      How is it a loss to use the justice system as it was written to convict someone of a crime?

      If Democrats are so worried about messaging that they’ll let innocent people rot in prison and only attempt to save one guy for a “win” that just means they actually don’t care about any of them.