Godric@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 6 days agoHappy anniversary of the day absolutely nothing happened at nowhere square!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square167fedilinkarrow-up1955arrow-down144
arrow-up1911arrow-down1imageHappy anniversary of the day absolutely nothing happened at nowhere square!lemmy.worldGodric@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 6 days agomessage-square167fedilink
minus-squaregmtom@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·4 days agoLmao, first time beat a tankie in an argument so thoroughly that they try to claim the Molotov Ribbentrop pact is just CIA propaganda, lol.
minus-squareAES_Enjoyer@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·4 days agoI already responded to you in a detailed historical account and you refused to read it because history is against your point of view
minus-squaregmtom@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·3 days agoLmao “no u” is always the last ditch go to of people who know they’re beaten. Although I was expecting some entertaining followup to you saying the Molotov ribbentrop pact was CIA propaganda, but alas. Hope one day you look back at this time in your life and cringe about what dumbass you were. Bye.
minus-squareAES_Enjoyer@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-23 days agoYou go on ignoring my comment and the historical evidence. I’m not doing “no u”, I’m asking for detailed critique of my analysis, which you refuse to do
Lmao, first time beat a tankie in an argument so thoroughly that they try to claim the Molotov Ribbentrop pact is just CIA propaganda, lol.
I already responded to you in a detailed historical account and you refused to read it because history is against your point of view
Lmao “no u” is always the last ditch go to of people who know they’re beaten.
Although I was expecting some entertaining followup to you saying the Molotov ribbentrop pact was CIA propaganda, but alas.
Hope one day you look back at this time in your life and cringe about what dumbass you were. Bye.
You go on ignoring my comment and the historical evidence. I’m not doing “no u”, I’m asking for detailed critique of my analysis, which you refuse to do