And how many got caught with the gun and a hand-written manifesto? It’s plain Luigi plugged the guy, the only question is if it’s justified, that’s what the court will determine.
Oh, I absolutely do not trust the cops, but given everything we have learned, it’s self evident he shot the guy.
As I say, the only bit that needs to be determined is if he was justified or not. His fans believe he was, which is why they float things like jury nullification, not that he’s innocent.
Like, if you can acknowledge that the screenshot of his face and the video of the shooting are from two different videos and there’s not continuous footage between the two…
Then I don’t understand why you keep saying it’s him.
If you can’t, then I don’t think there’s anyway I can help you understand this.
And I definitely don’t understand why you just want to keep repeating your opinion like it’s somehow a fact.
And how many got caught with the gun and a hand-written manifesto? It’s plain Luigi plugged the guy, the only question is if it’s justified, that’s what the court will determine.
You trust the cops. Why would you? They’ve been proven, just in the last five years, to have planted evidence on innocent people.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/judge-throws-man-guilty-plea-224510985.html
Oh, I absolutely do not trust the cops, but given everything we have learned, it’s self evident he shot the guy.
As I say, the only bit that needs to be determined is if he was justified or not. His fans believe he was, which is why they float things like jury nullification, not that he’s innocent.
You definitely do trust the cops, your entire argument here consists of trusting the cops
No, my argument is based on trusting observable reality.
Removed by mod
Repeated civility violations made me look at your account, you were already banned in World for trolling and genocide denial.
https://lemmy.world/modlog?page=1&actionType=All&userId=13639709
You clearly are not posting in good faith. Banned here too.
That doesn’t matter if it can’t be evidence…
We’re just going in circles.
You believe the cops because things the cops said…
Most can’t do that anymore
Again, we aren’t talking about what he’s found guilty of or not. We’re talking about if he shot the guy or not.
Saying the evidence is inadmissable doesn’t discount the fact that it was the gun used and the manifesto shows motive.
He DEFINITELY shot the guy. Whether he’s CONVICTED for it is a different issue.
Removed by mod
Because he was seen wearing a greenish coat?
Like, if you can acknowledge that the screenshot of his face and the video of the shooting are from two different videos and there’s not continuous footage between the two…
Then I don’t understand why you keep saying it’s him.
If you can’t, then I don’t think there’s anyway I can help you understand this.
And I definitely don’t understand why you just want to keep repeating your opinion like it’s somehow a fact.
Removed by mod