• SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I would argue that instead of ICE, we should have a vastly expanded IRS to enforce regulations upon businesses. For example, every business is assigned state and federal accountants, who check that the books are legit. These accountants are regularly rotated by the nation, so that companies can’t establish “working” relationships with any given accountant, which reduces corruption.

    This would increase the amount of money that government receives from the 1%, along with helping prevent wage theft or other criminal activities. Businesses, not migrants, are innately prone to corruption.

    • Tedesche@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I would argue that instead of ICE

      Why instead of ICE? These are not mutually exclusive things and they don’t even address the same problems.