• surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Bit of a spoiler, but that’s pretty much the premise of an alien invasion in the book Blindsight. They see our communications as an attack.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Probably not. Our wireless communications, with the rare exception of large radio station, is rather weak - on purpose.

    You get more radiation from a summer afternoon outside than from sitting in the same room as the router for decades.

  • MTK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    You might think that but really our radio waves are like a spark compared to the forest fire that is the sun. We only think of radio waves as extreme or flooding because they usually have better penetration because of the lower frequencies.

    This also why basically everything alive that has sight is looking at roughly the same spectrum as humans, it is just very abundant, has a high frequency (eyes can be small) and is just below ionizing radiation so easier to stay healthy. And the low penetration is useful, imagine a transparent tiger.

  • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    They’d have really big eyes. Depending on the wavelength they can see, they might be nearly all eye.

    If they were able to see a significant chunk of it at good acuity they’d have to be so big I doubt they could survive in a gravity well thanks to the square cube law of surface area. Be more like living space stations. If they were distributed organisms like a mycelium or Aspen colony, maybe they could survive actually visiting Earth, but they’d be really big. Processing that much data over large areas would mean they are very sophisticated thinkers but with a very high latency so slow.

    One fun implication of these building sized to tens of kilometer sized eyes is that am sources would look like a one color light source getting brighter and darker while an fm source would slightly shift colors. Going to earth would be like going clubbing with strobes and disco lights thrown everywhere.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      You’ve described the reasons why aliens that see in the radio spectrum would never evolve in the first place. Aliens from a particularly cool star might have their vision attuned to infrared, but no place that’s warm enough to have liquid water would be cold enough to make radio waves more useful than infrared.

      • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Yeah and even functional infrared eyes need to be at least twice the size of ours if not over ten times for more far thermal ranges. Anime eyes. The classic 20/20 D&D infravision would require eyes the size of basketballs, lol. Dark elves would put the innsmouth look to shame.

    • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      24 minutes ago

      Edit: the 2 comments below give a pretty good explanation as to why the following comment is not correct. Original comment, as always:

      I don’t see why they’d have to have big eyes. We use massive radio telescopes for sensitivity, not for the spectrum range. AM radio is in the order of 100 meter wavelengths, but handheld devices can receive it. Wavelength isn’t really the defining factor as much as being able to handle the frequency of the data over the time required. Wavelength is not how tall the wave is, amplitude is.

      • Natanael@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Massive singular radio telescopes are used to pick up individual signals from one direction, and can’t do imaging alone.

        Sure you can pick up long wave radio with smaller antennas, but not without trade-offs. They often need long coils, and to make up the remaining difference you need to very precisely control electric resonance, and you lose efficiency (you pick up less energy from the radio waves). You definitely can’t do imaging with just one.

        Just look at how big NFC and Qi coils are, they can’t practically be made smaller at those wavelengths, or else you lose too much energy!

        Massive radio telescope arrays spanning the globe uses the massive distance to create a tiny amount of angular resolution, just enough that with months of processing you can image a black hole a few light years away with some thousands of pixels. Compare to how your phone can run deblur algorithms on a fraction of the power over far more pixels, because the angular resolution makes such a huge difference (blur radius is infinitely smaller)

        Also, amplitude is signal strength. That’s only tall on a chart.

        • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          25 minutes ago

          Alright, I think I can see I was picturing data in the wrong dimension. The data for an AM radio, in a very human-like interpretation, is running along the time axis rather than actual width across the available sources. It’d take multiple radios to “see” multiple frequencies.

      • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Handheld devices can receive it, but to actually “see” with it you need a very large aperture(iris) and a “retina” with many of those antennas that respond to different wavelengths. The overall structure of an eye capable of seeing would be massive, not because the signal is faint or you can’t “fit” the amplitude in the aperture but because that’s what you need for acuity and to actually have meaningful angular resolution. Those long waves have more limited angles to fit in a given eye diameter. For something like AM, we’re talking a very big structure.

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angular_resolution

        θ ≈ λ/D where θ is the angular resolution, λ is the wavelength, and D is the diameter of the aperture

        As you can see, increasing the wavelength by orders of magnitude means you need to increase the aperture by orders of magnitude to get the same angular resolution.

    • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Im confused by the statement. If im reading this image correctly radio is well out side human range. Unless you meant you are not human in which case nvn.

      • truthfultemporarily@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        If you were an alien sensing radio waves a city for you would be the same as a bright day for us: we are used to lots of visible light being scattered around, and the aliens would be used to radio doing the same.

      • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        The point is we have adaptations that allow us to handle the amount of light we live in. As humans, it’s not sensitive enough for moonless night activities and not adaptive enough to handle staring at the sun, but appropriate for most earthly activities. Meanwhile, nocturnal eyes in other animals are easily overwhelmed in daytime and diurnal eyes can be even less useful at night. So for this alien, we can’t decide if it’ll be blinded or perfectly competent at handling our local illumination. All depends on if it evolved to hide between stars or eat inner planets

  • Hexagon@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Not sure why aliens would evolve to see like that. Their vision would be extremely blurry, the smallest detail they could resolve would be about the same size as the wavelenght (meters to kilometers).

  • Maestro@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    Doesn’t all our wireless communication basically amount to nothing compared to the sun?

  • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Life on earth that only sees in the radio part of the light spectrum is probably extinct now without us ever knowing it existed.

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    [off topic?]

    There’s a science fiction series called The Lensmen by ‘Doc’ E.E. Smith. Big influence on Star Wars and other space operas. In one book a human is preparing to visit one of the most dangerous civilizations in the Galaxy. Super-special, quadruple strength armored suit he hopes will be strong enough to protect him.

    The planet has a tech level equal to mid-20th Century Earth, but the natives are completely deaf. So none of the cars, trains, planes or other machinery has any noise dampening.

    He survives, but it’s close…

    https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-lensman-super-pack-e-e-doc-smith/20084689?ean=9781515460855&next=t

  • Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Almost definitely.

    TV stations are broadcast sometimes at 100KW. Compare that to a 40 watt LED bulb.