• deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 days ago

    Looks like it stalled due to lack of thrust. What could have killed both engines right after takeoff?

    • roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s always hard to judge AoA unless you’re looking side-on with a horizon for reference, but excessive nose-up attitude caused by cargo incorrectly loaded or not secured properly so it shifted aft during rotation could have caused an aerodynamic stall.

      • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It’s a passenger plane. I don’t think 200 people slid to the back of the plane after rotation.

    • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I was just thinking about this, perhaps when the aircraft rotated, water or other contaminants got drawn into the fuel system?

      Or shifting cargo damaged the fuel lines?

    • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      It seems to climb OK for a little while then suddenly start sinking. There’s no sign of an obvious engine problem. Not sure whether we’d be able to see any sign of a bird strike from this far away.

      • ShadowRam@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        bird strike taking out both engines? nah.

        This has to be pilot error. Even at stall, it looks like pilot didn’t even try to level out.

        • Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          This has to be pilot error. Even at stall, it looks like pilot didn’t even try to level out

          They were like less than 200m from the ground. There was literally no space to recover from the stall. You need some altitude to pitch the nose down and recover from a stall.

        • SoGrumpy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          bird strike taking out both engines? nah.

          Why not? That’s the reason Sully had to land on the Hudson.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      For multi engine planes it’s pretty rare, most likely a fuel system failure, or less likely pilot throttling error. My money would be on something with the fuel system.

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      “Did I fill the water in the right hole on that plane?” – Guy at the airport driving the freshwater tanker.

    • philpo@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, it’s rather strange. There is another one from a perspective where the aircraft almost “overflew” the cameraman (basically at a 5’o clock angle)- it shows them having aileron and elevator control right until they crash. And while the quality is poor, I am somewhat convinced that the RAT has not deployed (yet?)

      A bird strike would likely have caused something visible So it doesn’t sound like hydraulics or fuel(water in the fueltanks?) or something electronic wise with the engine control. Strange and sad.

      • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I just saw that video and it is really strange. Not so much that rat hasn’t been deployed, I don’t think they lost hydraulics or electronics and I’m not sure they even reached the minimum speed where the rat would really help.

        The strange thing is that it didn’t really look like there was very much yaw or rolling which you would expect to see with a fuel system failure. They seemed to be flying straight as an arrow and gliding it down?

        Maybe something wrong with thrust control? Kinda crazy.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Maybe, maybe not.

      What’s way weirder is that he’s got zero flaps and gear is still down, which is the exact opposite of what you want to do when climbing out. Maybe pilot error (control inversion)?

      • torrentialgrain@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Slats are 100% deployed, you can see that in the videos, indicating the plane was in Takeoff Config. Now, the flaps themselves are hard to make out in the grainy videos and they don’t extend much on takeoff. Edit: https://imgur.com/a/JzS3ro9

        Much more important is the lack of engine noise. We can also see the rat turbine was automatically deployed, indicating a complete loss of power only seconds after they rotated. Which is also why the landing gear did not retract.

        I don’t know what could’ve caused a dual engine failure, simultaneously, immediately after takeoff but that seems to be where everything is pointing to. Possibly problems with the fuel?