This article says that NASA uses 15 digits after the decimal point, which I’m counting as 16 in total, since that’s how we count significant digits in scientific notation. If you round pi to 3, that’s one significant digit, and if you round it to 1, that’s zero digits.

I know that 22/7 is an extremely good approximation for pi, since it’s written with 3 digits, but is accurate to almost 4 digits. Another good one is √10, which is accurate to a little over 2 digits.

I’ve heard that ‘field engineers’ used to use these approximations to save time when doing math by hand. But what field, exactly? Can anyone give examples of fields that use fewer than 16 digits? In the spirit of something like xkcd: Purity, could you rank different sciences by how many digits of pi they require?

  • j4k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I can’t say “professionally” but I learned CAD design with FreeCAD, and know the topological naming issue thoroughly.

    Almost all “mystery” problems in CAD are due to a combination of the hacks that get around the Topological Naming Issue and π.

    In CAD, you cookie, you brownie, you might even salad, but you stay the hell away from importing π as a reference on anything complex. For 3D printing, I never need better than 0.05mm so 3.1416.

  • chayleaf@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m a programmer and I remember 33 digits, but in practice I never use pi because I never have to deal with geometry

  • Asidonhopo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Retail, and to my knowledge among all my coworkers we have used zero digits of pi.

    When I code in C++ I use 15 digits of pi after the decimal point (double float) but I have only rarely coded for money and have never used pi for those work products, so again, zero digits on the clock.

    Ditto for restaurant work, although 2 decimal points would be more than enough if I needed the volume of a cake or other round food.

  • Vanth@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    3.14159

    Design of mechanical parts, specifically machined. 0.001" is a fairly tight tolerance for my applications, 0.0001" is going to cost a pretty penny and is used judiciously. We don’t really need to go to 3.14159 but I honestly think we do because it rhymes.

  • Thurstylark@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Ya know, this thread has inspired me. I’m a sound engineer, and find myself yelling “check one two three four” in the michrophone to test it all the time. I’m gonna start reciting the digits of Pi instead, and then as I learn them, I’ll progressively advance how many numbers of Pi that I use in my everyday job :D

    I work at a library, though. I should probably just go with poetry or Douglas Adams or something, but this makes me sound much more impressive

  • nycki@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Answering my own question: I work in web development and my usual value for pi is the standard JavaScript Math.PI. JavaScript uses 64-bit floats, which are accurate to about 15 decimal places. But that’s how many digits the computer uses. For practical math, I don’t think I’ve ever needed more than 2 digits of accuracy in an equation involving pi.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Software Engineering too, I just use std::numbers::pi. Don’t know how many digits it is offhand.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      TIL a 64-bit float is accurate to 16 sigfigs.

      Edit: actually, out of curiosity I decided to try and calculate it. I’ve very possibly done the wrong calculation, but what I did was log2(10x)=64, which works out to x≈19. Which isn’t 16, but is very close, and when you consider the way the float actually works it wouldn’t be too surprising that it was lose some information (the sign bit, for example, is immediately completely lost in this context).

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah I wasn’t sure if it would be correct to throw out the exponent entirely or if it might end up contributing some amount to the final accuracy of the number. I hadn’t spent a lot of time thinking about the problem.

          • explore_broaden@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yeah the exponent just allows you to represent lots of magnitudes, but it wouldn’t contribute to the accuracy because you basically have 1.xyz * 2exponent. So the xyz significand is the only part that counts for significant digits. Although I guess in some sense you are partially right, because the exponent exists it is assumed that the first bit is always one, since otherwise you would just adjust the exponent to the first one, so only 52 bits have to be stored.

  • stanka@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Chip R&D. We only use 1’s, 0’s if management is feeling generous. There are no circles, no need for pi.

    • FilterItOut@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      What are you talking about? I constantly explain the calculus of the flow rate in the push IV drug I’m giving by going through the (pi)r^2 * h of the syringe, with emphasis on the dh/dy. All my patients love hearing it. They constantly thank me as I finish giving them the dilaudid.

  • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m Australian. I normally manage a pie with 5 digits, unless it’s particularly crumbly or runny, in which case I will sometimes use 10!