• TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I was contending “Nazis lost the election to Hindenburg … and came to power anyway in 1933 regardless.” Hitler didn’t come to power for some amorphous reasons, but specific decisions by people in power. I agree that material conditions are important, but it’s so vague here that it’s meaningless and can be shifted at any point in this discussion to support your position.

      The Nazis agitated support on multiple fronts including electoral politics. Hindenburg surrounded himself with other military conservative and as conditions in the streets continued to worse economically and support swung to the nsdap, they urged him to give support to Hitler. However, the Nazis had won a plurality of the vote in every Reitsrat election starting in 1930.

      Electoral politics alone isn’t the answer. Never was. Garnering support on the ground is difficult work.

        • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Your initial presentation was vague. I agree that it could be made clear, but your initial posts just hinted at it.

          There are some similarities and a some important differences. If you don’t acknowledge the differences. I think you haphazardly write responses with half remembered idiomatic expressions, sensationalism, and simplistic thinking.

          With that said, you land in positions I might agree with. But you do a disservice to leftists. Do better.