• Hubi@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    Merely inconveniencing and injuring is sufficient.

    How would injuring not potentially fall under terrorism? It depends on the motivation alone.

    • palordrolap@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      You’re right. I wasn’t clear. It doesn’t look like they’re going out of their way to cause grievous injury though.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        What’s with the suggestion that they’re injuring people at all? Has it happened?