From age and ID restrictions on the Internet, to charging rappers with “terrorism,” the U.K. is demolishing the most basic civil liberties. If we let them, U.S. leaders may be close behind.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Britain never had free speech and always have been a absolute nanny state. It’s a prime example that government overreach does not result in any safety improvements.

  • Corelli_III@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago

    “and america could be next!” they literally have domestic concentration camps in america there is no freedom there

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      But how nice of the headline to imply such things don’t exist while pretending to be shocked about other things

  • Gates9@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    How many whistleblowers and reporters did Bush and Obama charge with the Espionage Act?

  • Deflated0ne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Pretty much every company that matters decided to go full 1984 censorship and surveillance all at the same time. And the governments are more than happy to play along. UK, US, etc. Pretty much all of “the west”

  • ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Hopefully this doesn’t devolve into another USA vs UK shit flinging contest. Authoritarianism is on the rise everywhere, Trump and Starmer are both utilising state power to crack down on dissent and opposition. Those of us who are opposed to this shit are on the same side.

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      100%.

      Doesn’t matter the country.

      Do you work for a living?

      Do you want to live without fear of governments and corporations breathing down your neck waiting to make an example of you or profit from you?

      …Then we should be on the same side. Simple as.

      Good-natured jabs aside, of course. ;) Love ya, Brits. <3

  • mriswith@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 day ago

    That was lost a while ago, but it’s nice more people are noticing that it’s getting worse.

    • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Labour is centrist and they desperately want to exert more control. English are sheep, so no one will protest daddy government.

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Someone call up the fine people of France and ask for lessons on how it’s done!

        (Heck, we North American should, too…)

      • teuniac_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Supposedly centrist. They’re curious whether being populist right wing on some issues will win over Reform UK voters. It’s just that they’re so curious and are doing this so often that they’re well on their way into morphing into a right wing party.

        so no one will protest daddy government.

        Yea this is a problem…

  • Mniot@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    142
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think the US will be fine as long as we don’t repeatedly elect some kind of cabal of pedophile authoritarians.

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I already can’t say what I really think about politicians and CEOs without getting banned from comments all over the place, so didn’t preach to me about censorship. I’m already chest deep in this shit.

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I don’t know if you just don’t pay attention or if you haven’t been on world much like this community is.

          • mikezeman@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            .World admins have pretty strict policies against advocating for violence of any form is what I believe they are referencing.

          • njm1314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            15 hours ago

            So just your first time on world then okay I got you. Not familiar with the mod team around here. Got it

  • monogram@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 day ago

    Remember VPNs definitely don’t help here, definitely don’t try to skirt any protections using a VPN, definitely remember to have your ID with you at the ready for any website to show to.

    • DapperPenguin@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      If you could project into the future, you might see that VPNs are a dwindling non-solution to the problem. As this unsettling trend makes waves across all jurisdictions in the world, every VPN’s IP will be subject to these new controls.* Eventually normies might need to understand technologies like Tor or I2P. Only problem is, if things get really bad they might ban the use of both outright. I’m not sure if I2P can be detected just as Tor, but I do know Tor users can be detected easily. Which is why if you’re in a “censorship” country you need to use some sort of special subset of entry guards. I2P might be better because every node in the network is like a router, none are specifically entry, middle, or exit nodes. Only thing I could think of, maybe some form of deep packet inspection? If everybody runs an I2P router, then simply making requests to other nodes is not enough to determine it’s an i2p communication?* It’s just distributed computing, the way the internet was intended!

      • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Any other useful info like this? Tryna snag as much of this stuff as possible (taking screenshots and offline copies of the pages) in the event it becomes unavailable and my existing methods fail on me.

        • DapperPenguin@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          You can simply go to the official tor or i2p pages and read more about details, then do follow up research from there. With i2p there’s actually a few parallel implementations actively being developed. Original is in Java, there’s a C++ one, and then another one I can’t remember. Very new implementations are being made in Rust as well

        • DapperPenguin@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          Thanks for volunteering to help the network in good faith! I think it is much easier for normal people to get an i2p router up and running and help the entire network, instead of setting up a tor node. And with the use of inbound/outbound unidirectional tunnels (which you can set up to 5 nodes each), you could theoretically have a 10 node round trip of intermediate tunnels between you and a server, as opposed to tor which uses a bidirectional tunnel.

          Some gracious users set up what is known as an “outbound proxy”, which acts like tor exit node to the clearnet. Personally I would never host one of these, as I am hesitant of having anonymous entities make clearnet requests and being held liable. But as an i2p router in somebody else’s tunnels, you can just imagine yourself as a road on a map that other roads connect to. The road isn’t responsible for what people are carrying on it, or what their destination might be. That would be an unreasonable expectation to place on any road. In fact, the router doesn’t have any idea of what the exact destination is, even if it’s the last node in the tunnel - simply because during the encryption/decryption process it only knows of the next address to hit!

          For example, say an i2p router hosts a git server. It could be the destination for packets, where clients are using it for version control, or it could act as a node in somebody’s tunnels to connect with other servers/clients. From the network view, I do not believe you can tell, and that is pretty neat.

          In the effort of being transparent and educating you, I do believe an outstanding problem is stream isolation. You should be able to do “soft resets” that reset your identity, although I forget the exact technical i2p term for this. This concern is for clients, not just leaving a router up. So if you intend on using that router to access the network yourself, it would be a good idea to do that soft or hard reset occasionally depending on your concerns. You can do it as often or never at all.

    • lad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s a good thing there are no scammers that could try stealing IDs pretending to verify you 😌

  • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    1 day ago

    The US is already well down the path with masked men kidnapping people on the street, holding them without any contact, defunding all sorts of media and billionaires suppressing all sorts off stuff in their media outlets.

  • SheeEttin@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Britain has never had free speech in the same way as the US, nor even of the press. Only in the last few decades, they’ve only had what’s required by the ECHR.

    • Fleur_@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well US free speech is telling lies and misleading millions of people on broadcast television.

      • bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I’d argue that’s more of a problem with media consolidation and not having some form of truth requirement in broadcast media. When only a handful of organizations own the majority of media outlets and aren’t held to account for their content, this is what we end up with and why we can’t have nice things.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      They literally have a Press Censorship system where they will send something called “D-Notices” to newspapers to shut them up.